Tlt<> Xt'tr Fori'Ht : j/.s Hixtori/ and //* 



Abroad lie was feared by the bad, whilst at home such order 

 prevailed throughout England, that a man might travel in safety 

 " with his bosom full of gold " from one end to the other.* 



What I do here protest against is the common practice 

 of implicitly believing every tradition, of repeating every idle 

 story which has been foisted into the text either by credulity 

 or rancorous hatred of, in fact, mistaking party feeling for 

 history. The Chroniclers had every reason to malign William. 

 His very position was enough. He had pressed with a hoavy 

 haud on the Old-English nobles, stripped them too often of 

 their civil power, and their religious honours ; and failing to 

 learn, had, like a second Attila, tried to uproot their language. 



The truth is, we are so swayed by our feelings that the 

 most dispassionate writer is involuntarily biassed. We in fact 

 pervert truth without knowing we do so. Language, by its 

 very nature, betrays us. No historian, with the least vividness 

 of style, can copy from another without exaggeration. The 

 misplacement of a single word, the insertion of a single epithet, 

 gives a different colour and tone. And, in this very matter of 

 the New Forest, we need only take the various accounts, as they 

 have come down, to find in them the evidences of their own 

 untruth. f 



* 77(e Chronicle. Ed. Thorpe. Vol. i. p. 354. Tliis, of course, must 

 not be too literally taken. It is one of those stock phrases which so often 

 recur in literature, and may be found, under rather different forms, applied 

 to other princes. 



| Voltaire was the first to throw any doubt on the generally received 

 account (E.isai sur fen Mceurx et T Esprit dcs Nations, torn. iii. ch. xlii. 

 p. 169. Pniithf'nii Litteraire. Paiis, 1836). He has in England been fol- 

 lowed by Warner (Topographical Remark* on the South- Western Parts of 

 HiiiiipJiirp, vol. i. pp. 164-197), and Lewis, in his Historical Enquiries 

 concerning the New Forest, pp. 4'2-~i~>. 



22 



