653 



POSSESSION. 



I**? wri . te . rs .. take q" !te a different view of the matter, and con- 

 ider every violation of possession as a violation of a legal right and 

 E? !S D cons l-% .? right of itself, namely, pre"um pt h-e 



_as provisional vindications. This 



detentio i., corporia 

 therefore limite it fa 

 pable of tradition 

 equires both 





a positive rule of law. Now if we 



^ : 







o it. But the wM th .. reonre some evidence 



independmt of Te ev1,ll ce , f transfe . r .,. f ovn, era hip may be entirely 

 the evidence of tho,c , , , on f^" '" - n f P"** i and also 

 that of the ; P2""-"* 'y be inseparable from 



act which sh,ll be , idenc ' -t then generally be some 



' 



act which sh,ll be , idenc 

 potion as HUH, .' 



panied by ownership or 

 acqnisition of ownership' 

 ownership. 



f possesskm whether 

 , or poascwion accom- 



*"" C m '' Icte 

 e exercise of 



don on and borrowed his definition 



-a 



SB 



H, r, * '"'r> lor B toe right to possess la not exercised thit ; u 

 does not become actuil nn *- lit IL CIlylDcu j LIUIU is, 



time (344 Wm IV 27 > ^J "!^ ' s ' "* collrse f 



ter. tue expression ""-- A ' 



ddi.'ix-d. Nor 



