I'lM \l.\l h>\ "i M- MM i.| 1EVEB 21 



i of the articles published I have referred 

 to the same line of treatment for measles, name 



Dr. Curgenven says he has tried 



!i<i IMUM.I it useless. My experience leads me 

 to a far different conclusion. As stated in my 

 first paper, I found it most beneficial. My sub- 

 sequent experience in several homes has fully 

 confirmed this. Y against this allow me to put 

 the following. The brilliant writer of "I' 

 was staying with her younger sister when the 

 vas attacked with measles (on a Saturday), 

 following Monday her mother consulted 

 me as to what precautions could be taken to pre- 

 i sister developing the trouble, and, 

 secondly, how the spread of the disease among 



six younger children (who had not then had 

 measles) could be prevented. She felt sure her 

 elder daughter would be attacked, as she was 

 considerably run down. Naturally I felt that this 



nished an excellent opportunity for a trial of 

 the eucalyptus ient, and I recommended it 



accordingly. eatment was at once begun 



and co The younger children had 



eu< placed in their pillows at night, and on 



a handkerchief on their chests by day. On the 

 sixteenth day measles became manifest in the 

 eldest daughter. There had been no isolation as 

 regards the others, and the treatment had still been 

 continued in their case ild they escape ? 



