From the Unconscious to the Conscious 



that Creator, whose creation would then appear to be his 

 faithful reflexion. 1 



It is evidently worth while to consider the insect 

 and to give its testimony due weight. If this testimony 

 had not been so neglected, it would have saved philosophy 

 from many errors. Unfortunately, as Schopenhauer 

 says: ' We do not understand the language of Nature, 

 because it is too simple! ' 



1 We shall see that philosophical idealism, based on facts, is com- 

 pletely detached from the old concepts of dogmatic theology. 



