536 PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT. 



I repudiate is the separation of feeling from the felt, or 

 of the desired from desire, or of what is thought from 

 thinking, or the division I might add of anything 

 from anything else." 



In this characteristic passage from Mr Bradley my 



readers may possibly divine much of that which unites 



him with or separates him from Lotze. But this is 



hardly the object which T have in view in transcribing 



ci. it. What I desire to convey is the impression how com- 



Bradley's 



to both tion ptetety English philosophical thought has, in this thinker, 



overcome the atomistic view of reality on the one side 



eVof and the transcendental on the other. For it is here 



clearly indicated that no analysis which starts, with 

 Hume, from separate ideas or, with Herbart and natural 

 philosophers, with independent Keals or separate atoms, 

 can satisfy onr conception of underlying reality. And, 

 on the other side, no noumenal " Thing in itself " still 

 less, " Things in themselves " as opposed to their appear- 

 ance or phenomenal existence can be considered to be a 

 fitting title for the Absolute. Mr Bradley objects to all 

 separation into independent detail, to all division of the 

 world into that which is Unreal and that which is truly 

 Eeal. He always looks to the whole, which is har- 

 monious, comprehensive, and individual, and which in 

 this its nature absorbs also that which is merely 

 apparent. 



There is indeed one great truth regarding reality 

 which Mr Bradley urges and defends in an original 

 manner. It is a truth which took greater hold of 

 thinkers as the century progressed. It indeed under- 

 lies or consciously governs nineteenth century thought 



