THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGE. 185 



is that Man is a spiritual being and that the direction 

 of his long career is towards an ever larger, richer, 

 and more exalted life. On the final problem of Man s 

 being the voice of science is supposed to be dumb. 

 But this gradual perfecting of instruments, and, as 

 each arrives, the further revelation of what lies be 

 hind in Nature, this gradual refining of the mind, this 

 increasing triumph over matter, this deeper knowl 

 edge, this efflorescence of the soul, are facts which even 

 Science must reckon with. Perhaps, after all, Victor 

 Hugo is right : &quot; I am the tadpole of an archangel.&quot; 



Before closing this outline two of the many omit 

 ted points may be briefly referred to. In thinking of 

 Language as a &quot; discovery,&quot; it is not necessary to as 

 sume that that discovery involved the pre-existence 

 of very high mental powers. These were probably 

 developed part passu with Speech, but did not neces 

 sarily ante-date it to such a degree as to make the 

 preceding argument a petitio princrpu. Obviously the 

 discovery of Language could not in the first instance 

 have been responsible for the Evolution of Mind, since 

 Man must already have had Mind enough to discover 

 it. But this does not necessarily imply any very high 

 grade of intellect very high, that is to say, as com 

 pared with other contemporary animals for it is pos 

 sible that a comparatively slight rise in intelligence 

 might have led to the initial step from which all the 

 others might follow in rapid succession. An illustra 

 tion, suggested by a remark of Cope s, may help to 

 make plain how a very slight cause may initiate 

 changes of an almost radical order and on the most 

 gigantic scale. 



