THE FISHERIES. 229 



the impressment of real or pretended British subjects 

 on board ships of the United States, And it left 

 room, by its silence, for Great Britain to raise ques 

 tion of our right to participate in the coast fisheries, 

 which question, although dealt with from time to time 

 in successive treaties, has more than once seriously 

 endangered the peace of the two Governments. 



Does war have the effect of annulling all existing 

 treaties ? A general answer to this question is given 

 by one of the most authoritative of modern publicists 

 [Calvo] as follows : 



&quot;If the treaty of peace modifies anterior treaties, or express 

 ly declares the renewal of them, the dispositions of the treaty 

 of peace are thereafter to constitute the law; but if no partic 

 ular mention is made in this respect, the anterior treaties must 

 necessarily continue to have full force and effect. In order 

 that they should be deemed definitively abrogated, it would 

 be requisite that they shall not only be suspended by the war 

 but annulled in fact, as in the case of treaties of alliance of 

 which the raison d etre ceases at the end of the war: it would 

 be requisite, indeed, that their contents should be incompatible 

 with the stipulations of the treaty of peace, which occurs, for 

 example, in what regards ancient treaties relative to the de 

 limitation of frontiers between two States.&quot; 



The Supreme Court of the United States lays down 

 the law as follows : 



&quot; TTe think that treaties stipulating for permanent rights and 

 general arrangements, and professing to aim at perpetuity, and 

 to deal with the case of war as well as of peace, do not cease 

 on the occurrence of war, but are, at most, only suspended 

 while it lasts ; and unless they are waived by the parties, or 

 new and repugnant stipulations are made, they revive in their 

 operations at the return of peace.&quot; 



Such has been the received doctrine in the United 



