k . : x : : v 1 7 v 5 A i z : ; .< ;_>::: 



v.e 

 was 



v . ---.: 



TtepcintZ 



::-- /-I :.; .V -; 



ation 



wiH a 



ctthmt? Sofpoie tint wage* and interest 

 enty per cent; w>0 it then pay the former 

 *t more unit* per acre? If the rent should 



the same as before the reduction in wages 

 terest, and if the foregoing reasoning with 



10 the proper nitensitf of cotore be true, 

 gree of intensity in terms of ojujiitjlies of 

 and capital-goods which would yield the 

 t net return would not change; but the ex- 



110 





