294 HERSCHEL. 



Royal Society of London, Dr. Thomson, who went so 

 far as to suppose that the learned astronomer &quot;had 

 wished to deprive the first observers of those bodies, of 

 all idea of rating themselves as high as him (Herschel) 

 in the scale of astronomical discoverers.&quot; I should re 

 quire nothing farther to annihilate such an imputation, 

 than to put it by the side of the following passage, ex 

 tracted from a memoir by this celebrated astronomer, 

 published in the Philosophical Transactions, for the 

 year 1805 : &quot; The specific difference existing between 

 planets and asteroids appears now, by the addition of a 

 third individual of the latter species, to be more com 

 pletely established, and that circumstance, in my opinion, 

 has added more to the ornament of our system than the 

 discovery of a new planet could have done.&quot; 



Although much has not resulted from Herschel s hav 

 ing occupied himself with the physical constitution of 

 Jupiter, astronomy is indebted to him for several im 

 portant results relative to the duration of that planet s 

 rotation. He also made numerous observations on the 

 intensities and comparative magnitudes of its satellites. 



The compression of Saturn, the duration of its rota 

 tion, the physical constitution of this planet and that of 

 its ring, were, on the part of Herschel, the object of nu 

 merous researches which have much contributed to the 

 progress of planetary astronomy. But on this subject 

 two important discoveries especially added new glory to 

 the great astronomer. 



Of the five known satellites of Saturn at the close of 

 the 17th century, Huygens had discovered the fourth ; 

 Cassini the others. 



The subject seemed to be exhausted, when news from 

 Slough showed what a mistake this was. 



