216 



FRESNEL. 



that a given ray loses it momentarily, and that another 

 given ray, on the contrary, is deprived of it for ever? 

 The theory of interferences, considered in this point of 

 view, seems more like the reveries of a disordered brain, 

 than the exact, inevitable consequence of numberless 

 experiments, clear of all possible objection. And fur- 



cuted. But it was not until after lengthened investigation that the 

 two philosophers just named succeeded in establishing experimen 

 tally the important law (obvious as it now seems,) that &quot; polarized rays 

 can only interfere when they are polarized in the same plane. 1 1 If they 

 were polarized in rectangular planes (for example), no interference 

 could result, were all other conditions ever so perfectly fulfilled. Now, 

 this could only be explained on the supposition of the vibrations 

 being performed in planes transverse to the ray. Granting that in a 

 ray polarized in one plane all the vibrations take place in one plane, 

 (whether in the same plane or perpendicular to it,) it is then readily 

 seen that when the vibrations of two rays are at right angles to each 

 other, there can be no mutual destruction, or mutual cooperation. It 

 is only when they are in the same plane that this can occur. 



This principle was at length found to supply the explanation of the 

 polarized tints. Every ray of the light (p) originally polarized in one 



plane, in traversing the crystal plate (c) was divided into two; an 

 ordinary (o) and an extraordinary (e); all those of the one kind, o, o/, 

 o&quot;, &c. being polarized in one plane, and all of the other, e, e/, e&quot;, &c., 

 in a plane at right angles to the last. But in each ray o, and e, di 

 verge from each other by a very small angle. The whole pencil also 

 diverges at a small angle from p; thus, the only rays which can coin 

 cide in direction, will be a ray o, of one set, with a ray e of the next; 

 &amp;lt;/, with e&quot;, c. &c., and as these are unequally retarded in differ 

 ent degrees according to their inclination, they would be in a con 

 dition to give interference, were it not that being polarized in places 



