VELOCITY OF LIGHT. 241 



parent body. If this velocity increase, the refraction 

 will be less, and, reciprocally, a diminution of velocity 



that it would, on any obvious a priori grounds, enable us to predict 

 the result of such an experiment one way or the other. There is 

 indeed involved the difficult and complex consideration of the propa 

 gation of vibrations through asther, while the earth and transparent 

 media upon it are moving through that sether; a problem which ex 

 ercised the ingenuity of Fresnel, and which, after a long investigation, 

 he decided by concluding that the effects would be exactly the same 

 as if the earth were at rest. This, however, may be still regarded as 

 one of those points connected with what is the most difficult part of 

 the wave theory, viz: the primary conception of gether and its prop 

 erties. 



But apart from this consideration, and looking only to the abstract 

 problem of light (suppose emitted on the surface of the earth) falling 

 &amp;gt;n a refracting body with different velocities, there is nothing appar 

 ently in theory to determine whether the refraction will be affected 

 or in what way, by this difference. 



On the undulatory principle, it is true, velocity is intimately con 

 nected with refraction; retardation and refraction being coextensive 

 and almost equivalent terms ; but it must be borne in mind that it is 

 not absolute but relative velocity which is thus connected with refrac 

 tion. It is the relative retardation in the denser medium, whatever 

 the absolute velocity may be, which causes refraction. If in theory it 

 were shown that the ratio would be constant for all velocities it 

 would give a constant refraction for the medium. But this is the 

 very point in question ; and there appears nothing antecedently to 

 show, on any distinct theory of the nature of sether or of waves, that 

 the relative velocities must necessarily be in a constant ratio. There 

 is, however, nothing in any conception of waves at variance with the 

 idea; and it must be admitted as in itself a rational and probable sup- 

 sition, fairly admissible in the first instance to ground any reason 

 ing upon. When therefore the fact was established by Arago s 

 experiment, while it completely subverted what was a necessary 

 sequence of the emission theory, it offered no contradiction to the 

 undulatory; but the proposition it established being one already prob 

 able, and consistent with that theory, was now to be recognized as an 

 essential part of it. Yet the result of Arago s experiment has been 

 represented by some able writers as of a very startling and unex 

 pected nature, and, at first sight, equally perplexing on either 

 hypothesis. 



SEC. SER. 11 



