

XI INTRODUCTION. 



rived, without reaching at last a widest truth which can be merged 

 in no other, or derived from no other. And whoever contemplates 

 the relation in which it stands to the truths of science in general, 

 will see that this truth, transcending demonstration, is the Persist 

 ence of force.&quot; * * * 



&quot; Such, then, is the foundation of any possible system of posi 

 tive knowledge. Deeper than demonstration deeper even than 

 definite cognition deep as the very nature, of mind, is the postu 

 late at which we have arrived. Its authority transcends all others 

 whatever ; for not only is it given in the constitution of our own 

 consciousness, but it is impossible to imagine a consciousness so 

 constituted as not to give it. Thought, involving simply the estab 

 lishment of relations, may be readily conceived to go on while yet 

 these relations have not been organized into the abstracts we call 

 space and time ; and so there is a conceivable kind of consciousness 

 which does not contain the truths commonly called d priori, in 

 volved in the organization of these forms of relations. But thought 

 cannot be conceived to go on without some element between which 

 its relations may be established ; and so there is no conceivable 

 kind of consciousness which does not imply continued existence as 

 its datum. Consciousness without this or that particular form is 

 possible ; but consciousness without contents is impossible. 



&quot; The sole truth which transcends experience by underlying it, is 

 thus the Persistence of force. .This being the basis of experience, 

 must be the basis of any scientific organization of experiences. To 

 this an ultimate analysis brings us down ; and on this a rational 

 synthesis must be built up.&quot; 



To the question, &quot;What then is the value of experimental inves 

 tigations upon the subject, if the truth sought cannot be estab 

 lished by inductions from them ? Mr. Spencer replies: &quot;They are 

 of value as disclosing the many particular implications which the 

 general truth does not specify ; they are of value as teaching us how 

 much of one mode of force is the equivalent of so much of another 

 mode ; they are of value as determining under what conditions each 



