62 EVOLUTION AND ETHICS u 



than a bundle of potentialities. But, very early, 

 these become actualities ; from childhood to age 

 they manifest themselves in dulness or bright 

 ness, weakness or strength, viciousness or up 

 rightness ; and with each feature modified by 

 confluence with another character, if by nothing 

 else, the character passes on to its incarnation in 

 new bodies. 



The Indian philosophers called character, as 

 thus defined, c karma.' 6 It is this karma which 

 passed from life to life and linked them in the 

 chain of transmigrations ; and they held "that it is 

 modified in each life, not merely by confluence of 

 parentage, but by its own acts. They were, in 

 fact, strong believers in the theory, so much 

 disputed just at present, of the hereditary trans 

 mission of acquired characters. That the mani 

 festation of the tendencies of a character may be 

 greatly facilitated, or impeded, by conditions, of 

 which self-discipline, or the absence of it, are 

 among the most important, is indubitable ; but 

 that the character itself is modified in this way is 

 by no means so certain ; it is not so sure that the 

 transmitted character of an evil liver is worse, or 

 that of a righteous man better, than that which 

 he received. Indian philosophy, however, did not 

 admit of any doubt on this subject ; the belief in 

 the influence of conditions, notably of self-dis 

 cipline, on the karma was not merely a necessary 

 postulate of its theory of retribution, but it pre 





