MULTIPLICATION OF THE HUMAN RACE. 5H 



crease of expenditure, leaving a diminished surplus, reduces 

 the degree of fertility, is not wanting. Some of it has been 

 set down for the sake of antithesis in the foregoing section. 

 Here may be grouped a few facts of a more special kind 

 having the same implication. 



To prove that much bodily labour renders women less pro 

 lific, requires more evidence than has at present been collected. 

 Nevertheless it may be noted that De Boismont in France and 

 Dr. Szukits in Austria, have shown by extensive statistical 

 comparisons, that the reproductive age is reached a year 

 later by women of the labouring class than by middle-class 

 women; and while ascribing this delay in part to inferior 



latcs and adds to it.&quot; Or, as he elsewhere says &quot; Be the range of the 

 natural power to increase in any species what it may, the plethoric state inva 

 riably checks it, and the depkthoric state invariably develops it ; and this hap 

 pens in the exact ratio of the intensity and completeness of each state, until 

 each state be carried so far as to bring about the actual death of the animal 

 or plant itself.&quot; 



I have space here only to indicate the misinterpretations on which Mr. 

 Doubleday has based his argument. 



In the first place, he has confounded normal plethora with what I have, in 

 355, distinguished as abnormal plethora. The cases of infertility accom 

 panying fatness, which he cites in proof that over-feeding checks increase, are 

 not cases of high nutrition properly so called ; but cases of such defective ab 

 sorption or assimilation as constitutes low nutrition. In Chap. IX, abundant 

 proof was given that a truly plethoric state is an unusually fertile state. It 

 may be added that much of the evidence by which Mr. Doubleday seeks to 

 show that among men, highly-fed classes are infertile classes, may be out 

 balanced by counter-evidence. Many years ago Mr. G. H. Lewes pointed this 

 out : extracting from a book on the peerage, the names of 1 6 peers who had, 

 at that time, 186 children ; giving an average of 11 6 in a family. 



Mr. Doubleday insists much on the support given to his theory by the 

 barrenness of very luxuriant plant , and the fruitfulness produced in plants 

 by depletion. Had he been aware that the change from barrenness to fruit- 

 fulness in plants, is a change from agamogenesis to gamogenesis had it been 

 as well &quot;known at the time when he wrote as it is now, that a tree which goes 

 on putting out sexless shoots, is thus producing new individuals ; and that 

 when it begins to bear fruit, it simply begins to produce new individuals after 

 another manner he would have perceived that facts of this class do not tell 

 in his favour. 



In the law which Mr. Doubleday alleges, he sees a guarantee for the 

 maintenance of species. He argues that the plethoric state of the indivi- 



