15 



Was the Bunclrowes case reported to you ? No. 

 Was it reported to you officially ? It was not. 

 Who was the person that explained the law of the case to 

 the fishermen was it Mr. Tredennick ? I do not re- 

 member. 



Did you hear me say that if any damage was done, it was a 

 waste of time to come to the Petty Sessions, but to go to 

 the Court of Admiralty ; and that if any stones were thrown 

 into the boats, or any breach of the peace or personal injury 

 committed, that it would be noticed ? You did ; but cannot 

 say your words exactly. 



On your oath, did I not tell those fishermen who complained 

 on the 19th of June, that in case any damage was done to their 

 property, on the high seas, that they had another court than the 

 Petty Sessions, in which they could get redress? You used 

 words to that effect. 



Did I not say that if a breach of the peace occurred, it would 

 be attended to by the magistrates, and would be punished ? 

 You mentioned that, or spoke to that effect. 



W T ill you say it was not Munday who used the words " hack " 

 and " slash ?" I did not hear him say so. 



Did Owen Kerrigan say there can be more of that play? 

 I heard some angry expressions. 



Not from Kerrigan ? He might have said that. 

 You took no note of that, and yet you took a note, you say, 

 of my words ? I was called on officially so to do by Mr. Tre- 

 dennick. 



Did you hear the name of John Gilvarry on that day, or did 

 he say you may cut away and hack away ? I did not. 



Your mind was attending to what fell from the Bench ? Tt 

 was, as I am bound to do so officially. 

 You did not compare notes with Mr. Tredennick ? No. 

 Did Mr. Davis make any remarks ? No. 

 Did Mr. Allingham ? No. 



Are you aware of any private object or interest I could have 

 in the case, that would have influenced my conduct ? I cannot 

 answer that question. 



