C H AFTER VI 



DARWIN AND DARWINISM 



UPON comparing the scientific proofs for 

 the probability of the theory of evolu- 

 tion, we find that they grow the more 

 numerous and weighty, the smaller the circle of 

 forms under consideration; but become weaker 

 and weaker if we include a greater number of 

 forms, such as are comprised in a class or in a 

 sub-kingdom. There is in fact no evidence what- 

 ever for the common descent of all plants and 

 animals from a single primitive organism. Hence 

 the greater number of botanists and zoologists 

 regard a polygenetic evolution [i.e., from vari- 

 ous primitive organisms] as much more acceptable 

 than a monogenetic [from a single form]." Such 

 is the accurate and scientific summary of our evo- 

 lutionary knowledge as presented in the article on 

 "Evolution," in the "Catholic Encyclopedia." It 

 agrees with what has already been stated. How 

 little reason, consequently, there can possibly be 

 for dogmatism on this subject is now apparent. 

 But the briefest outline of the history of evo- 

 72 



