LETTER No. 22. 



We issue this * co.ee, a m.staKe that 



occurs ; our pamphlet, ^^^^* At the 



Polystictus Montane, as a synonym y elamina tion of what we 



time ' r^*7STS^!X *. herbarium o f Mon- 

 assumed wore co-types ys remember them) that 



taglie at Paris. We believed ^f &8 Eoly8tictu s parvu.us, 

 they are the plant or.gmally named f^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ 



and which (following Bresadola's publ, ews^ a ^^.^ 



d one, e referred to **" by Qn.et which are 

 the original types, sent by Montagne, nlied that they can not 



th e same plant, and as soon as we saw hem -og ^ ^ ^ 



possibly be our Amencan -V* found , Fries' herbarium, we 



e 



" 



t any rate we were surely in error i 

 W0 r, on specimens found in ~ , je t done, 



structure" <^'L Montagnei is a good species, 



t whene pubHshed it as ^^^ that there is a feeling 

 ln th ,s connection , ma ^"^ , eon8idel . Polj8 tictus Mon- 

 it 



, 



creeping over me that it Tridentini, plate ic, 



form of the plant pub, shed 



tagnei 



not creditable to hide them. 



Tpsala, Sweden, October 14, 1908. 



UNlVESHITY OF CALIFORNIA 



AT LOS ANGELES 



