sequent publications and of the Zollinger collection, 872, named by 

 Leveille, but not the original. 



Junghuhnii (Daed. betulina, Jungh.) Lenzites. Type in it found. 



Junghuhnii (Ins. Bantam) Favolus. Type in Box 209. Thi^ i> 

 a marked species and I think is the only specimen in any museum. It i> 

 a large species with the upper surface strongly "granular-squama! 

 arranged in lines. The only similar species I have noted is Polyporus 

 fuscolineatus (Type in Brit. Mus.). 



Korthalsii (Korth. No. 30). The type cited is in Box 23* and has 

 recently been labeled "Polyporus sideroides, Lev. form ap.xla." I 

 think that is correct although it is a plant of quite different appearance 

 from the type of Polyporus sideroides. Both have the same context 

 and abundant, globose, colored spores, 8-9 mic. (Compare I'olyporu.s 

 sideroides.) I believe that Leveille had Haskarlii confused with Kor- 

 thalsii in his later publications and in his naming at Paris and in Zoll. 

 Coll. 872. 



leptopilus (Pol. No. 3). Type not found. 



lurida (No. 27) as Daedalea. The type in Box 143 is now labeled 

 "Daedalea flavida, Lev.=Pol. lenziteus, Lev." I think that is correct, 

 also it is in my opinion ochroleuca, Lev., Hobsonii, Berk, and many 

 other names. 



Molkenboeri (macrotrema, Jungh.) as Hexagona. Type in !Vr- 

 soon's Box 42. This was an unauthorized change of Junghuhn's name 

 to which Junghuhn naturally objected. (Cfr. Hex. Synopsis, p. 30 

 also Letter No. 37. 



microcyclus (Zipp. Mss.) Type in Box i^l'olystictus tabacinns 

 of Montagne. 



multiplex, Favolus (Pol. c'ristatus). Type in Box 5*. 

 very much if the American specimens usually referred to Favolus 

 multiplex in the museums are correctly referred. 



murinus (Korthals) as Lenzites. Type in Box 242. 

 to betulinus now but I think is a good species. The gills are n 

 the nature of those of Lenzites repanda. The surface is very n 

 tomentose, zoned. The context is isabelline. 



murinus ( versicolor, Zipp.) No type found by me. 

 in Box 137 so labeled now seem to answer Leveille s descnpti. 

 were ori-inaly labeled "Pol. eximius" which Leveille referred to 

 porus detonsus. They are surely the same as bruneoli 



3.t K^CW 



notopus (proboscideiis, Jungh.) No type found b> 

 There is a specimen so named by Leve.lle at Pans, but , 

 and scanty to serve any purpose. 



Pala (Herb. Miquel). Type not found. 



peltatus (Fav. No. 4) Favolus. Not foundry 



There 



are a numoer of' K l-y ln,h,,.,n ,.f I'olys.ic.us san s n 



3 



