ley took the genus Laschia to apply to the resupinate species with 

 long, superficial pores, and as the name Laschia was preoccupied, it 

 was changed to Hymenogramme and Laschia Crustacea is also entered 

 in Saccardo (Vol. 5, p. 652) under the genus Hymenogramme. 

 Whether the genus Hymenogramme in the sense of Berkeley and 

 Montagne can be maintained or not is another question, but I think 

 this species at any rate should go in Poria. 



durus. Type in cover, also in Box 114.* This is quite a distinct 

 species with dark, atropurpureus context. It was named also carti- 

 lagineus (type at Kew) and Testudo (type at British Museum ) by 

 Berkeley. 



flavus. Types in Boxes 82* and 109.* A common species in 

 the tropics. For me it is a Polystictius, which Junghuhn beautifully 

 figured and I think he should be given the credit for the species. As 

 I have published I doubt if it is the same, as has been stated, as Irpex 

 flavus of Klotzsch which was from the arctic regions. 



floccosus. Type in cover and in Box 35.* This is the Eastern 

 analogue of the American plant called Polystictus rigens. It has the 

 same context and pores but the surface is different. 



fusco-albus (changed to Junghuhnii because it is a duplicate 

 name). I did not find the type. 



furcatus. No type found by me. 



indecorus. Type in Polyporus cover. It is a Trametes form of 

 Polystictus Persoonii. 



indica (Daedalea). Type in Box 117. It is in very bad con- 

 dition, eaten by insects, but I think is the common Lenzites repanda 

 of the tropics which has so many other names. 



lacerus (Why changed to lacer in Saccardo?). Type in cover 

 also in Box 77.* It was published as lacevus but Junghuhn vvn.tr 

 his label lacerus which no doubt was as intended. The plant is the 

 same as dilatatus (bis) of Berkeley, which Cooke changed to Adami. 



macrotrema. The type is (in error) in Persoon's Box 

 The name was changed, without Junghuhn's consent or authority, t 

 Molkenboeri by Leveille. (Cfr. Syn. Hexagonas, p. 30) 

 white Hexagona. 



microscopicus. No type found by me. 



miniatus. Type in cover. Also a figure in the unpub 

 In my opinion it is a thin form of Polyporous sulphureus. 



Mons veneris. Type in Box 176.* It is the same spcc.es as 

 leoninus as named by Klotzsch, better known as funahs, a quit 

 mon species in the East. 



3 



