during the trip that I could not name at sight. I did find one Femes that had the largest 

 pores I ever saw in a Femes, but when I got home and compared it I concluded it was only a 

 large-pored form of Femes badius. I found but a single specimen. Fomes badius (cfr. Fomes 

 Synopsis, page 249) is for me only a large-pored form of Fomes rimosus, but the largest pores 

 I had previously seen, a. specimen from D. Griffiths, Texas, measured 300 mic., which is 

 double the normal size. 



The specimen I found in Cuba has pores again double from 500 to 600 mic., and to the eye 

 seems different, but with the same characters, otherwise it would be folly to propose a species- 

 on it, for specimens of Fomes badius, I have previously noted, vary as to pore sizes. In fact, 

 to my mind a tendency to vary in some feature, like the pore sizes of this species, the hymenium 

 configuration of Lenzites flavida, is the character of the species. There is some variation in 

 all species, no doubt, but some are characterized by a tendency to vary in a certain line. To. 

 propose as "new species" each specimen showing a slight difference is the merest nonsense, but 

 a large part of the so-called "new species" that encumber Saccardo are based on just such 

 vague basis. 



NOTE 384. As soon as you read this note, sit down and drop a postal card to 

 the United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., and ask them to send 

 you a copy of Bulletin No. 175, entitled "Mushrooms and Other Common Fungi," by Flora W.- 

 Patterson. It is the best general introductory work that has ever come to our notice. It em- 

 braces the common species and is illustrated with fine photo-engravings by which they can be 

 identified. No one who is interested in the study can afford to be without a copy of the bulletin, 

 and it can be had for the asking. 



NOTE 385. Fomes annosus and Trametes Persoonii. I have been handling these two 

 species in quantities for a iong while, and never suspected that there were any very close 

 resemblances between them. Recently I received from Rev. C. Torrend, Brazil, a specimen, 

 that I referred to Fomes annosas (annual form), but noting that in his letter Father Tor- 

 rend had referred it to Trametes Persoonii, I began making some comparisons that sur- 

 prised me. While the pileus and context colors are similar, usually there is no confusing 

 the thin, tropical plant with large, usually elongated pores, (T. Persoonii), with the small 

 pored, rigid plant of temperate regions (Fomes annosas). But the specimen in question 

 had medium, round, and regular pores, and on comparison I could hardly tell it from a 

 specimen I have from New York of Fomes annosus, with same sized pores. The spores, 

 however, show the difference, elliptical 3 1 /4-4x8 in Trametes Persoonii and globose, 3^,4-4 

 mic. in Fomes annosus. Since my attention has been drawn to it, I question a determina- 

 tion I made for J. Umemura, Japan, (No. 12) as Fomes annosus. I do not find spores in. 

 it and I rather suspect it may be a small pored, regular form of Trametes Persoonii. 



NOTE 386. Daedalea ungulata. Pileus sessile, ungulate, 2-3 inches thick, surface pale, 

 minutely and densely pubescent. Context antique brown, varying to raw sienna. Pores- 

 sinuate, daedaloid, with thick walls. Hymenial surface pale, alutaceous, contrasting with 

 the context colon Hymenium pubescent with projecting, subhyaline hyphae. Spores not 

 found. 



Though smaller, this has same shape and hymenial configuration as Daedalea quercina, 

 but the coloration is like Lanzites saepiaria. I am satisfied it is only an ungulate, daedaloid 

 form of Lenzites saepiaria, but no such form is known elsewhere than in Japan. Of this 

 the color and shape are similar to Daedalea Guyoniana from Algeria, known from' one old 

 specimen at Paris (as JTrametes). At first I so referred this collection, but I have since 

 noted that Daedalea Guyoniana has colored spores and belongs to Prof. McGinty's "new 

 genus" Phaeodaedalea, hence can not be the plant from Japan. 



NOTE 387. Stereum australe, from Geo. E. Morris, Massachusetts. (Cfr. Note 115,, 

 Letter 48.) This species which corresponds to Stereum fasciatum (and I think is so called 

 by Burt), with the exception that the hymenium "bleeds," I found in Florida, and was 

 under the impression that it did not occur in the North. We shall have to correct that, now 

 that we have it from New York, but we can not concede that it is Stereum fasciatum, which 

 Schweinitz records "vulgate et maxima Pennsylv." 



NOTE 388. Xylaria Corna-Damae, from Geo. E. Morris, Massachusetts. Usually re- 

 ferred to Xylaria digitata (in error) in American lists, as for instance. Frost's New Eng- 

 land list and Kauffman's recent New York list. 



NOTE 389. Laternea bicolumnata in California. In a letter received from L. C. 

 C. Krieger, California, he informs me that the specimen of Laternea bicolumnata that was 

 found in California, (Cfr. Letter 59, Note 305) was developed in some earth that contained 

 phaenogamous plants from Japan. It is therefore probable that the specimen was only 

 adventitious. It would be interesting to learn, as the years go by, if this species becomes 

 established in California, as Lysurus borealis has become established in the Eastern States. 



NOTE 390. Lycoperdon subincarnatum, from J. B. Cleland, Australia. This is a pe- 

 culiar species, characterized by the little pits on the peridium like those of a thimble, and 

 its hyaline, septate capiilitium. It is rather rare in the United States, and is (excepting 

 the common L. piriforme) the only puff ball we have that habitually grows on logs. (Cfr.. 

 Mye Notes, page 233.) We collected it in Samoa, and we believe that the scanty material 

 representing Lycoperdon purpureum at Ke\v, from Bonin Island, is the same plant, but 

 the "type" is too poor to consider. 



NOTE 391. Polyporus Berkeley!, from Kose M. Taylor, Michigan. Growing on fir logs. 

 The well known Polyporus Berkeley! of our Eastern States is developed from a sclerotium. 

 (Cfr. Letter 49, Note 23), and usually occurs at the base of oak trees. Mr. Weir finds it 



15 



