THE APPLES OF NEW YORK. 247 



mild subacid with an agreeable but not high flavor and good quality. It is 

 a good apple but hardly equal to other varieties of its season. The tree 

 does not come into bearing very young but is a pretty good grower and 

 eventually a good cropper yielding full crops biennially. 



Received in 1884 fr m Ellwanger and Barry, Rochester, N. Y., for testing 

 at this Station. 



YELLOW CALVILLE. 



REFERENCES, i. Budd, la. Agr. Coll. Bui, 1885:17. 2. Gibb, Am. Pom. 

 Soc. Rpt., 1887:48. 3. Beach and Paddock, N. Y. Sta. An. Rpt., 13:584. 

 1894. 4. Beach, W. N. Y. Hort. Soc. Rpt., 41 :5O. 1896. 5. Ragan, U. S. 

 B. P. I. Bui, 56:345, 353- 1905- 



SYNONYMS. Kalvil jeltui (2, 5). Kalville scholti (i, 2, 5). No. 442 (i, 2, 

 3, 5). Voronesh No. 21 (3). YELLOW CALVILLE (i, 2, 3, 4, 5). 



An August apple, medium to rather small, smooth, pale yellow, some- 

 times with faint blush, oblate to oblate conic. Cavity acute, wide, rather 

 shallow ; calyx closed ; basin shallow, slightly wrinkled ; flesh white, fine- 

 grained, tender, moderately juicy, subacid, fair or sometimes good. The 

 tree comes into bearing moderately young and is nearly an annual cropper. 

 Not recommended for cultivation in this state being much inferior to standard 

 sorts of its season. 



Historical This is a Russian apple, being No. 442 of the importation of the 

 United States Department of Agriculture of 1870 (3, 5). Later it was im- 

 ported by the Iowa Agricultural College under the designation Voronesh 

 No. 21 (i). In 1888 it was received for testing at this Station from Dr. 

 T. H. Hoskins, Newport, Vt. It is practically unknown in New York. 



YELLOW TRANSPARENT. 



REFERENCES, i. Leroy, 1873:846. fig. 2. Budd, la. Hort. Soc. Rpt., 1880: 

 523. 3. Downing, 1881:114 app. fig. 4. Am. Pom. Soc. Cat., 1881 :i6. 5. 

 Webster, Montreal Hort. Soc. Rpt., 7:54. 1881. 6. Gibb, Ib., 7:154. 1881. 

 7. Ib., la. Hort. Soc. Rpt., 1883 :437. 8. Barry, 1883 :336. 9. Hoskins, Rural 

 N. Y., 43:651. 1884. fig. 10. Penhollow, Montreal Hort. Soc. Rpt., 10:65. 

 1884. ii. Thomas, 1885:530. 12. Rural. N. Y., 44:185, 200. 1885. 13. 

 Gibb, Montreal Hort. Soc. Rpt., 1886-87:14. 14. Am. Pom. Soc. Rpt., 

 1887:92. 15. Rural N. Y., 46:107, 201, 382. 1887. fig. 16. Can. Hort., 

 11:209, 223. 1888. 17. Fisk, Montreal Hort. Soc. Rpt., 14:33. 1889. 18. 

 Can. Hort., 13:121, 132, 216, 272, 301. 1890. 19. Hamilton, Montreal Hort. 

 Soc. Rpt., 15:27. 1890. 20. Can. Hort., 15:281. 1892. 21. Bailey, An. 

 Hort., 1892 :253. 22. Budd, la. Sta. Bui, 19 :535. 1892. 23. Pa. Sta. Rpt., 

 1892:110. fig. 24. Hoskins, Card, and For., 7:138. 1894. 25. Woolverton, 

 Ont. Fr. Stas. An. Rpt., 2:11. 1895. figs- 26. Van Deman, Rural N. Y., 

 55:613. 1896. 27. Hoskins, Ib., 56:156. 1897. 28. Woolverton, Ont. Fr. 

 Stas. An. Rpt., 4:5. 1897. figs. 29. Waugh, Vt. Sta. Bui, 61:32. 1897. 

 30. Alwood, Va. Sta. Bui, 130:122. 1901. 31. Waugh, Vt. Sta. An. Rpt., 

 14:313. 1901. 32. Hansen, S. D. Sta. Bui, 76:119. 1902. fig. 33. Dickens 

 and Greene, Kan. Sta. Bui, 106:56. 1902. 34. Munson, Me. Sta. An. Rpt., 

 18:85, 88. 1902. 35. Rural N. Y., 61:626. 1902. fig. 36. Budd-Hansen, 

 VOL. II 21 



