PRRMISSIIILE IRRI<:ATI0N ( IIAitOlS 87 



ictual oporntions, witljout oithor dt-proointion or intorost. Tho same 

 Item for depreciation of trees used in the preceding: table has been 

 added. 



The Farm .MaiiapMueiit Section of the Collejre of Ajjriculture has 

 recently revis«»»l its estimate of the cost of produeinj? peaches, this 

 assuming jjood farm or^jani/ation and efTieirnt manapenient. Their 

 fiirures in detail are presi-nted in Table l.T Tlu'Sf tiiriires are for pre- 

 harvest operations aii<l material. «ii<l are assmnt-d to be the same 

 repardlciis of yield or variety. 



TABLK IJ 



CX>ST PER ACRE OF PRODUCING PEAOIES. AS ESTIMATED BY THE FARM MANAGE- 

 MENT SECTION. COLLEGE OF A< .RUn.TURI", INri,UDING INTEREST 

 AND DEPRECIATION ON IMPLEMliNTS AND WORK STOCK 



OvkmueniMm 12 40 



CoT*f craft: 



Dukiac. two ««vi t\ '^2 



Seed -• It) 



8M«fii« 4S 4 <0 



14 77 



ISO 



25 i3 



32 40 



3 «8 



Dio^ bonn and loforth..... ........ ............................. 3 60 



Dwaag la eoTcr crop I 13 



CNihirBtioa 3 68 



IrngBtM" i*t)or, iochidiiic buid prvpcrmtion 4 3S 



Tool 198 18 



In Table \'.\ there is inelnded an allowance for interest' and deprecia- 

 tion on implements and work stock, but no allowance for depreciation 

 on tre«»s. I'pon request, the Farm Manapement Section has revised this 

 table to eliminate interest. an<l the fitrun' has bfen added for deprecia- 

 tion on tn'cs. as is f^iven in Tables 1". 11. iin<i 1-. Th''<.> r.vi>,lMr.< ;ir.» 

 piven in Table 14. 



TABIE 14 



COST PER ACRE OF PROIH;cIN<; PEAOIES. as estimated by the farm MANAtJE- 



MENT SECTION. COLLEGE OF At.RIC irLfURE. NOT INCJ.UDINCi INTTRliST 



ON IMTI ? "• ' rs AND WORK STCKK. BUT INdUDIMi THE SA.ME 



ALL*' FOR DIPRICIATION ON PEA( H TRIIS AS IS 



USED ELSEWHERE IN TllIS REPORT 



rpkrrp oa ■I'tdMi-^.— *-' ■•' 



DUtW- *' *^ 



iWaiac. 



Dtnicbann aod *o (ortb 



r«ltt*attM 



InteliM Wmt. tacl^ 



TolkJ IttS U 



It will be noted that the totaU pn'sented in Tables 11 and 12 ar^ 

 substantially less than the average of the Aprienltural I on 



Senice. t'' ' - - - ' ■ - • of p- on 



than the a\ ; _ > wever. sts 



presented in Table 11 are for highly orjranize*! and relatively large 



