172 HISTORY OF THE 



G. Rush, Esq. H. S. Waddingdon, Esq. 



Duke of Rutland. R. Watt, Esq. 



Sir John Shelley. Marquis of Westminster. 



T. Assheton Smith, Esq. Lord Wharncliffe. 



Lord Southampton. C. Wilson, Esq. 



Lord Stanley. Earl of Wilton. 



Sir T. S. M. Stanley. 



ADJUDGED CASES. 



CASE 1. 



A, B and C run for a subscription the best of 

 heats. A wins the first heat, B the second. C's 

 rider, after saving his distance the second heat, 

 dismounts between the distance-post and the end ; 

 but remounts, rides past the ending-post, and 

 weighs as usual ; starts, and wins the third heat, 

 and weighs, without any objection being made. A 

 being second the third heat, in a short time afterwards 

 demands the subscription, not knowing till then 

 that C's rider had dismounted, and refuses to start 

 for the fourth heat, which B and C run for, and C 

 wins. 



It was decided that, no objection having been 

 made to C's starting for the third heat, he was 

 entitled to the prize. 



CASE n. 



The winner of a plate whose horse had distanced 

 all the others, applied for the stakes or entrance- 

 money which was advertised to be paid to the 



