in 



4;UKlcd tUcnji ? troin oniumcut^d gurdons ; 

 froin givr(Jei>s, of wtiicji it is tlic peculiur 

 and cl>;vractcmtic dji^tiiictipa, xhi^t t^y 

 4re oruaiacuUd, aud nothing ^'Ise; and 

 therefore^ .in JtuUiux, the ua;ne giard'n^) i* 

 apj;ropriuted solely to thewj, «iixd never (as 

 gurdcJii hi EngUsh, or jardin in French) 

 iftj^de to j?;gftify cither kitcliew, lor pleasure 

 gg.rde#. J iiiust ijay, l[)jereib^e, with ah the 

 respect d.ve to Mr. M^vson, thiit to moiiO 

 limpHcily the i^-bitress of orB^nvint, is, in 

 u\y ide^i, hke making n>ercy the arbitrcss of 

 juijtice, pr friigahty of generosity, Jt is a 

 very proper and u^tyral scatim^nt, that 

 inercy should teniper the $tem quidities of 

 justice, in ihc sanjp marijier that siinphcity 

 slipuld correct aod ti^ipper the profusion ^nd 

 ^Httcfrpf ornaroeut; hut the s^gcs of the law 

 wQijld, I believe, think it an c^vtraordinary 

 posiljpu, were any autJior to assert that 

 nicrcy is the arbitrm gf what is just aiid 

 Tight. On the other J^and, it is equally ob- 

 vious that the (irmiicss of justice, should 

 correct thc^ wyldiiGs^, hgwcv^jr auuable, of 

 i^^r^y; aud thiU w- the r^nm uiatujuer the 



