SUMMARIES OF THE HIBTOLOCIC CHARACTERS, ETC. 



-'.II 



The second two hybrids differ almost u much from 

 each other a* they do from th-ir parent*, or n thf parent* 

 differ from ra<-h other. Kiparental inlirr nuini- 



feat in all of the designations, varying < 1 1 tTereiictw in tin- 



<* of influence of one or tin- other pa;. 

 quite apparent throughout. In form, the grains 

 yianttta incline to If. boirdfni. and those of N. abund- 

 ance to the other parent ; but the grain* of the hybrids 



iirv wry clow to one another. In hilum. .V. giantta 

 it cloaer to N. tarniennt var. rorwca major; whereat 

 in N. abundancr it UK linen in character to .V. lux 

 l.tit in eccentricity to the other parent. In character, 

 .V. abundance is nearer than N. giant ru to N. bou 

 In both lamella? and sin there are reversals in both In - 

 drills of parental relationship*. In aiie ff. abundance 

 U nearer than .V. giantrst to N. bowdrni. In the 



TABUC C6. Nareitnu. 



