152 APPENDIX. 
Darwinian grace by pointing out that Bateson is “living 
the life of a scientific specialist, out of the main current 
of biological discovery.” How very strange! Professor 
Bateson is indeed a specialist — in biology, and evolution 
is a biological problem; in heredity — and evolution ab- 
solutely depends on heredity. And because Professor 
Bateson is a specialist, “his opinion is valueless”! What 
queer logic! 
The fact is that there are two groups of thinkers who 
are determined to uphold evolutionism: First, a certain 
class of scientists who have still a living faith in the 
Nebular Hypothesis and the Neanderthal man. They 
cling to their creed. They are wedded to their idols. 
Then there are the New Theology men. Their idea of 
the Bible is based upon evolution, and if evolution falls, 
their whole system goes down in a heap. And so Charles 
S. Mac Farland, general secretary of the Federal Council 
of Churches, has come out against Mr. Bryan. And 
Prof. Charles E. Fosdick, professor in Union Theological 
Seminary, and one of the most distinguished Sadduceans 
of our day, writes a long article to the Sunday papers ~ 
in which he proves that if you want to believe that God 
created man as related in Genesis, then you must believe 
that the heavens are an upturned bowl, and he quotes 
Ps. 104, 2. Why does he not quote the next verse, to 
prove that the ancient Jews believed that the water has 
“chambers” and the wind “wings’? Was ever poetry 
so made to walk on all fours? 
But we said that the modern disciples of Darwin 
offer no proof. This must be modified, — they do offer 
proof, and the argument they produce is the evolution 
of the horse. Now, the geological history of the horse 
has been, these many years, a source of delight to the 
evolutionist. Fossil horses have been found that have 
four toes, others that have three, others with two; and 
