THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPREGNATIONAL ISOLATION. 95 



frequently than other';. In a memoir on Regression, Heredity, and Panmixia, 

 recently published, I .ocve ventured to term this possible factor of progressive 



evolution " reproduc^jny selection," 



This dcfinitioi iTVcettis very definitely t<> include not only sexual 

 selection but the,reArms of reflexive selection which I have called social, 

 filio parental, ddadnational, and impregnational selection. But we 

 can have but li^he^ confidence that we have reached the correct inter- 

 pretation of the meaning he would have us give to the terms " repro- 

 ductive selection " and "fertility," for when we come to the con- 

 cluding U'litence of the chapter, on page 102, we read: "In civilized 

 man th<U survival of the fittest appears to be replaced by the survival 

 of the most fertile," which seems to imply that fertility as he uses 

 it does not depend on fitness. 



13. The Importance of Impregnational Isolation. 



The prevention of crossing between groups produced by the dif- 

 ferent forms of impregnational isolation is connected with several 

 problems of great interest. After referring to the terms segregate 

 survival, segregate union, and "physiological isolation," under which 

 sonic of these principles have been grouped, we will consider certain 

 of these problems. 



(1) Segregate survival has presented itself to my mind in five aspects, 

 namely: Segregate fecundity, rigor, adaptation, freedom from coin peti- 

 tion, and escape from enemies. 



These are the influences that give emphasis to the importance of 

 any form of positive segregation by which those of any one kind are 

 brought together and enabled to breed together. It may at first seem 

 that these are simply the forms of selection that are producing trans- 

 formation within the different intergenerating groups. It is, how- 

 ever, quite otherwise: for diversity of selection may exist in full 

 force in two adjoining districts, and partial positive segregation may 

 exist between the two groups of a species occupying these districts; 

 but, if the mixed unions are as fertile as the pure unions, and produce 

 young as successful in surviving as those produced by the pure unions, 

 the probability is that the two groups will not become increasingly 

 divergent. 



Impregnational isolation has now been presented under eight forms, 

 of which the first three rest on morphological and physiological incom- 

 patibilities preventing or interfering with mixed unions, which may, 

 therefore, be called segregate union. The second group of five forms 

 rests on incompatibilities preventing either the normal fruitfulness of 

 mixed unions or the power of the young thus produced to reach the 

 ratio of individual survival and reproduction reached by the young of 



