[64 APPENDIX I DIVERGENT EVOLUTION. 



regation, can do nothing toward bringing creatures together accord- 

 ing to their compatibilities. The forms of segregation that place or 

 draw together creatures of like innate characters I call forms of posi- 

 tive Si gregation. 



Of each form of segregation which we have up to this point con- 

 sidered, the segregating cause has been one that distributes individuals 

 of the same species in groups between which free intergeneration is 

 cheeked ; while the propagation of the different groups depends sim- 

 ply on the original capacity for intergenerating common to all the 

 members of the species. The intercrossing has been limited not by 

 the capacity but by the opportunity and inclination of the members. 

 Coming now to cases in which complete lack of capacity for fruitful 

 crossing is the cause that prevents the production of mongrels, we find 

 a dependence of a very different kind; for to insure the propagation of 

 the different groups it is not enough that the general opportunity for 

 the members of the species to meet and consort remains unimpaired. 

 There must be some additional segregating influence bringing the 

 members together in groups corresponding to their segregate capacity, 

 or they will fail of being propagated. 



The form of impregnational segregation which I call prepotential 

 segregation is due to the prepotency of the pollen of a species or variety 

 on the stigma of the same species or variety, and complete potential 

 segregation is due to the potency of the pollen of the same species, with 

 the complete impotence of the foreign pollen. When allied species of 

 plants are promiscuously distributed over the same districts, and 

 flowering at the same time, prepotency oj this kind, aided by the free dis- 

 tribution of the pollen by the wind, is one of the most direct and efficient 

 causes of segregate breeding. The same must be true of varieties 

 similarly distributed whenever this character begins to affect them. 

 In the case, however, of dioecious plants and of plants whose ovules 

 are incapable of being impregnated by pollen from the same plant, no 

 single plant can propagate the species. If, therefore, the individuals 

 so varying as to be prepotent with each other are very few, and are 

 evenly distributed amongst a vast number of the original form, the 

 probability is that the)' will fail of being segregated through failing 

 to receive any of the prepotent pollen. It is thus apparent that when 

 the mutually prepotent form is represented by comparatively few indi- 

 viduals, their propagation without crossing will depend on their being 

 self fertile and subject to germinal or floral segregation, or on their 

 being brought together by some other form of positive segregation. 



When a considerable number of species of plants are commingled 

 ami are flowering at the same time, their separate propagation is 



