I 



TI 



68 



313 27 



Ji 



rrrr 



I 



n 



HT 



PSTO 



W 



4 9 25 



^ rT~TOWT^S ^ 



s sa 



.;ii 



3 516 58 3 



1029^S^EJ^6J44 3^.^3 78 46324 !!34^^iSJ^2 



223 S(> 6"^ ||2 ^ I n o 5<S|8 



5 2 5 7 4( 



SiJ: 



266 6 47 5 65 ^ 2J 



?2 2 3 2 2 3 



he chart published by Nettleship based on Cunier's records with later additions.) 

 il. The affected man (DJ^) who married the affected woman {DJ?) is represented 



ays through the affected, showing that the condition is due to a dominant factor. 

 1. It cannot be said that the responsible factor is a simple allelomorph. Never- 

 e of descent of a dominant variety. 



