IIG "TERRA NOVA'' EXPEDITION. 



between the N.Z. area and the Antarctic coast-line, extending between Stations 

 13 and 42. which latter is the most southerly record. The finest series at Station 

 40. Other good examples at Stations 32, 33, 34. At Station 39 all tlie individuals 

 were notably small. 



176. Cydamniinu cancellata, Brady. 



Cydamminacancellata, Brady, 1879, etc., RRC. 1879. p. 62 (Nautiloid lituola) ; 1884, FC. p. 351, 

 pi. xxxvii, figs. 8-16. 

 Cushman, 1910. otc. FNP. 1910, p. 110, tigs. 168-171. 



Stations 18. 23, 29 (+ D.). 



A siuf^le imperfect but undoubted specimen at Station 18, small ones at 

 Stations 23 and 29. 



177. Cyclammina orbicularis, Brady. 



Cydammina orbicularis, Brady, 1879, etc., RRC. 1881, p. 53; 1884, FC. p. 353, pi. xx.xvii, 



figs. 17-19. 

 Cushman, 1910, etc., FNP. 1910. p. 113. fig. 173. 



Stations 8, 16, 23, 29, 32, 35. 



One large and tvpical specimen from Station 8. Similar specimens from 

 Stations 23, 29, and 32. A doubtful specimen from Station 35. 



F.\MiLY TEXTULARIIDAE. 

 SuB-F.\MiLY TEXTULARIINAE. 



TEXTULARIA, Defrance. 



178. Textularia inconspicua, Brady. 



Textularia inconspicua, Brady, 1884, FC. jj. 357. pi. xlii, fig. 6. 



Heroii-AUen and Earland, 1914, etc., FKA. 1915, p. 623, pi xlvii, 

 figs. 1-4. 



Stations 2, 3, 5, 6 (+ R. d. J.). 



Verv fine and typical specimens attaining considerable size at Stations 5 and 

 6. All the examples are much nearer to Brady"s figure than to Millett"s, and 

 they are all characterized by thick bands of clear shell-substance, markmg the 

 sutural lines and originating in a thick striated ring, which forms the basal out- 

 line of the successive chambers, as shown in Brady's fig. 6 b. This thick band 

 gives an appearance of limbation, but when seen in side view none of the speci- 

 mens are truly limbate, and thus referable to the var. jugosa. 



Cushman (C. 1919, RFNZ. p. 626) refers this form to the Rotaliidae, imder 

 the name of Discorbis inconspicua, Brady, referring to Millett and Brady and 

 his own previovis remarks (C. 1910, etc., FNP. 1911, p. 11). He states that from 

 six N.Z. specimens he has been able to determine definitely that the form should 

 be placed among the Rotaliidae, " in some of its markuigs it resembles Patelliaa 



