ii EVOLUTION AND ETHICS. 79 



Further, I think I do not err in assuming that, 

 however diverse their views on philosophical and 

 religious matters, most men are agreed that the 

 proportion of good and evil in life may be very i 

 sensibly affected by human action. I never heard ' 

 anybody doubt that the evil may be thus increased, 

 or diminished; and it would seem to follow that 

 good must be similarly susceptible of addition or 

 subtraction. Finally, to my knowledge, nobody 

 professes to doubt that, so far forth as we possess 

 a power of bettering things, it is our paramount 

 duty to use it and to train all our intellect and 

 energy to this supreme service of our kind. 



Hence the pressing interest of the question, to 

 what extent modern progress in natural knowl- 

 edge, and, more especially, the general outcome 

 of that progress in the doctrine of evolution, is 

 competent to help us in the great work of help- 

 ing one another? 



I 



The propounders of what are called the " eth-J 

 ics of evolution," when the " evolution of ethics "[ 

 would usually better express the object of their 

 speculations, adduce a number of more or less in- 

 teresting facts and more or less sound arguments 

 in favour of the origin of the moral sentiments, 

 in the same way as other natural phenomena, by 

 a process of evolution. I have little doubt, for my 

 own part, that they are on the right track; but asj 

 the immoral sentiments have no less been evolved,! 

 there is, so far, as much natural sanction for the ) 



