330 FttAGMENTS OP 1 SCIENCE. 



10,000 feet high, the consumption of the same man would 

 be 2 oz. 4 drs. 50 grs. of carbon. Boussingault had deter- 

 mined experimentally the addition to be made to the food 

 of horses when actively working, and Liebig had deter- 

 mined the addition to be made to the food of men. Em- 

 ploying the mechanical equivalent of heat, which he had 

 previously calculated, Mayer proves the additional food to 

 be amply sufficient to cover the increased oxidation. 



But he does not content himself with showing, in a 

 'general way, that the human body burns according to 

 definite laws, when it performs mechanical work. He 

 seeks to determine the particular portion of the body con- 

 sumed, and in doing so executes some noteworthy calcula- 

 tions. The muscles of a laborer 150 Ibs. in weight weigh 

 64 Ibs.; but when perfectly desiccated they fall to 15 Ibs. 

 Were the oxidation corresponding to that laborer's work 

 exerted on the muscles alone, they would be utterly con- 

 sumed in eighty days. The heart furnishes a still more 

 striking example. Were the oxidation necessary to sus- 

 tain the heart's action exerted upon its own tissue, it 

 would be utterly consumed in eight days. And if we con- 

 fine our attention to the two ventricles, their action would 

 be sufficient to consume the associated muscular tissue in 

 3^ days. Here, in his own words, emphasized in his own 

 way, is Mayer's pregnant conclusion from these calcula- 

 tions: " The muscle is only the apparatus by means of 

 which the conversion of the force is effected; but it is not 

 the substance consumed in the production of the mechanical 

 effect." He calls the blood " the oil of the lamp of life; " 

 it is the slow-burning fluid whose chemical force, in the 

 furnace of the capillaries, is sacrificed to produce animal 

 motion. This was Mayer's conclusion twenty-six years 

 ago. It was in complete opposition to the scientific 

 conclusions of his time; but eminent investigators have 

 since amply verified it. 



Thus, in baldest outline, I have sought to give some 

 notion of the first half of this marvelous essay. The 

 second half is so exclusively physiological that I do not wish 

 to meddle with it. I will only add the illustration em- 

 ployed by Mayer to explain the action of the nerves upon 

 the muscles. As an engineer, by the motion of his finger 

 in opening a valve or loosing a detent, can liberate an 

 amount of mechanical motion almost infinite compared 



