43 2 



PHYSIOLOGY 



Such curvatures are called in general tropic and the phenomena tropisms. 

 To these terms is often prefixed a word indicating the stimulus which 

 calls forth the tropism, as geotropism (ge, the earth = gravity), photo- 

 tropism (photos, light), etc. (see p. 458). When a curvature evoked by 

 either a uniform or a one-sided stimulus is restricted to a single plane by 

 the bifacial structure of the organ, the curvatures are called naslic, and 

 the phenomena nasties. This term is also applied to like curvatures 

 due to unknown (" internal " or " inherent ") causes. Thus we have 

 epinasty and hyponasty, photonasty, photepinasty, etc. (see further, 

 p. 442). In the organisms capable of locomotion, a one-sided stimulus 

 may determine the direction of creeping or swimming. These phenom- 

 ena are toxic, collectively taxics, and individually chemotaxy, phototaxy, 

 geotaxy, etc., according to the stimulus (sec p. 446). 



Energy relations. — Not only is the mode of reaction independent of 

 the kind of stimulus, but its energy is disproportionate to the amount of 

 energy expended in excitation. The stimulus, therefore, cannot be the 

 sole cause of the reaction, though the two stand related to each other 

 apparently as cause and effect. On the unexpected pricking of the finger, 

 little energy is expended; the sudden jerking away of the hand involves 

 many times as much. Somewhere this energy must have been released 

 and applied; and this is one reaction of the series, whose final one was 

 movement. So in the plant, stimulation often involves a mere fraction 

 of the energy expended in the final movement; it is released, presumably 

 from the protoplasm or some part of it that is particularly unstable, and 

 is applied to the work. If this be so, the chemical changes (metabolism) 

 ought to be different in a stimulated and unstimulated organ. 



This hypothesis, however, has not yet been verified experimentally. Reinvesti- 

 gation of the one case in which such a result was reported has produced a conflict 

 of evidence. 



Another hypothesis, that stimulation results in molecular strain only, from 

 which there is gradual recovery, sufficiently accounts for fatigue (sec next para- 

 graph), but does not account for the disparity in energy between stimulus and re- 

 action, the existence of which its advocates merely ignore or deny. 



Fatigue, tetanus, and summation. — After an organ is stimulated once 

 and the response occurs, the original state i> presently regained, and the 

 organ is ready to respond again as at first (tig. 671). If several stimuli 

 follow, each before complete recovery, the responses are of less extent 

 than before. This effect is described by the term fatigue, and in many 

 cases the responses gradually become smaller and smaller until they 



