A HISTORY OF NORFOLK 



7 by 1 1 feet in extent, walled with flanged tiles for part of its height, 

 and containing bones of oxen, pigs and other animals, oyster-shells and 

 potsherds of Roman date. Skeletons, coins (mostly a.d. 270—320), tiles 

 and pottery were noticed at the same time in other parts of the field, 

 and a subsequent writer states vaguely that foundations of buildings exist 

 here. (2) In 1843 ^ claypit north-east of the church yielded a burial 

 urn full of bones and ashes, covered by a tile, and also remains of an 

 inhumation in a wooden coffin. (3) In 1851 a kiln containing broken 

 pottery and a curious iron drying-stand was dug out of a sandpit on the 

 south side of the church, between it and the marshes. (4) In 1855, 

 during the construction of the reservoir, much broken pottery (including 

 Samian), a little bronze bust (.? a Faun), a bronze pin, many 'Third 

 Brass ' coins, bones and oyster-shells were found — apparently the filling 

 of a rubbish-pit. (5) In 1879 a rude flint pavement or foundation was 

 exposed in the rectory garden, and some coins, pottery and an ashpit dis- 

 covered. Besides these definitely recorded finds, coins, potsherds and 

 occasionally other objects — such as a little bronze figure of a wolf or 

 dog, formerly the top of a staff or the like — have been recorded without 

 detail of place or circumstance, ever since the days of Sir Thomas 

 Browne. The earliest coins date from about a.d. 80, but those of 

 A.D. 250-380 are the commonest.' 



These remains, like the remains of Caister-by-Norwich, do not 

 indicate military occupation, and in the entire absence of military in- 

 dications, it will be safer to hold Caister-by- Yarmouth to have been a 

 small settlement of some sort, not adequately known as yet. Its situation 

 may seem exposed to any chance sea rover, but girt as it is with marsh 

 on south and east, it is less exposed than might at first sight be thought, 

 and not more exposed than other Roman remains of a non-military kind 

 on some of our coasts. Excavation or chance discovery can alone, 

 however, decide beyond controversy : it is enough here to state the 

 probabilities. 



4. The Villas 



We have seen that Roman Norfolk is poor in towns. It is hardly 

 richer in villas. No county in the south-east of England possesses, in 

 proportion to its area, so few remains that indicate the residences of land- 

 owners or the scattered structures connected with their estates. Nor are 

 the remains merely few in number : they are also plain in character, and 

 the list which I am about to give contains not even one instance of that 

 common luxury, a mosaic pavement. This poverty is characteristic. 

 We must indeed allow something in our estimate for evidence that has 

 perished and evidence that has not been yet unearthed. The rural 



1 For (i) see Gentleman's Magazine, 1837, ii. 5 18 ; for (2) Archceologtcal Jounol, iii. 251 and 

 Dawson Turner MS. 23,027, p. 132 ; for (3) Norfolk Airhaohgy, iv. 352, Journal of the Biitish Arcka- 

 ohgical Association, xxxvi. 90, 206 ; for (4) Norfolk Archeology, vii. 12 ; for (5) ibid. ix. 361 and Journal 

 of the B. A. A., xxxvi. 89 ; for the bronze wolf (?) Norfolk Archeology, vii. 356. It and other objects 

 from the site are in the Fitch room of the Norwich Museum. See also Browne's Ur-nburial, chaps, ii., iii., 

 and the Winchester volume of the Archaeological Institute, p. xl. (Samian and other pottery). 



294 



