470 Lt.-(Jolonel 11. IT. Godwin-Austen on 



Radnla not got out so well as to see a complete row and 

 count the whole of the marginal teeth. The formula is 



+ 45 . 2 . 12 . 1 . 12 . 2 . 45 + , .or +59 . 1 . 59 + . 



The marginals nearly evenly bicuspid. The jaw with a 

 central projection. 



The young animal of a species (No. 3391) was sent me by 

 Johu Ponsonby on 28ch April, 1911, from the Game Pass, 

 ]\looi River, as Kerkophorus ? transvualensis, Craven. I have 

 not seen the shell. Vide 'Annals/ January 1912, p. 128. 

 '•' New genus? '* 



The animal is distinct from anything else as yet received. 

 The I'isceral sac has the branchial umll very sparse/// speckled 

 ivHh black on a pale ground, a narroiv black line above the 

 liver and heart, the apical ivhorls plain umber-broivn with no 

 juottUng of any sort. 



The lobe over the mucous gland very long and dark- 

 coloured, overhanging a straight closed slit. A trace of a 

 right shell-lobe; its shape could not be seen, nor could I 

 see any left shell-lobe. The left dorsal lobe in two wcU- 

 sepai'ated parts. 



The radula was got out complete; it has fewer admedian 

 teeth than any as yet dissected, in form as usual, the marginals 

 evenly bicuspid. Formula : — 



32. 3 . 6 . 1 . 6. 3 . 32, or 41 . 1 . 41. 



The jaw rounded above, with a central projection. 



Kerkophorus sp. ? 



East London ; a single specimen. 



This species was sent to me on 20th March, 1913, bv 

 Major M. Connolly. Tlie animal was dried up within the 

 shell ; but by leaving it to soak in water many useful cha- 

 racters were brought to light. There was the elongate lobe 

 at the extremity of the i'oot ; the ivall of the branchial sac 

 was sjjursely spotted with white on a pule ground, much 

 more thickly so on the whorls and apical portion, larger 

 spots running togdher ; there was no sign of the large 

 triinigulur white, patch in the vicinity of the heart, so con- 

 spicuous in the specimens sent previously by Major 

 (yonnolly from the same locality, and of which In; thought 

 this a bigger specimen of ? M. pondoensis. The generative 

 organs were not well preserved, and no spcrmatophore was 



