Zouluyical Society. 287 



a little white, and shows as it were an imperfect attempt at annula- 

 tion. The back is black, with a bright fulvous fleur-de-lis sort of 

 murkiiii^ on tlie neck ; a narrow band of fulvous crosses below the 

 scaj)ul;v', from which run at right angles down the back to tlie riunp 

 two inilistinct stripes of the same colour, about half an inch ajjurt ; 

 the inside of the ears is fulvous, the outside black, with a white sj)ot 

 on each ; the belly white, beautifully but irregularly spotted with 

 black ; a very distinct black band crosses the chest ; a white spot on 

 the lower eyelid and another longer on the upper ; the cheeks are ful- 

 vous, striped with black ; the forehead is fulvous, ornamented with 

 black, two stripes of which run up the forehead from the eyes, parallel 

 to each other ; they are connected together above : immediately over 

 the eyes are four longitudinal spots ; above these may be traced three 

 more irregular, and over these three, two, the three sets of sj^ots 

 being as it were ranged in ranks. The fulvous colour is chiefly con- 

 fined to the fore-part of the animal. It was presented to the Royal 

 Zoological Society of Ireland in the beginning of 1 84 3 by Paymaster 

 J. M'Creagh, of the 32nd Regiment. The foregoing description 

 was taken in January 1844, and the animal was presented to the 

 London Zoological Societj"^ in May 1844 : when first obtained its 

 colouring was very indistinct and confused ; since the description 

 was written some trifling change has taken place, particularly in the 

 extension of the white on the tail, which makes the name not quite 

 so applicable as it was." 



Mr. Prichard read his paper " On the Crania of the Laplanders 

 and Finlanders, with observations on the difi^crcnces they presented 

 from other European I'aces." 



" Little has hitherto been done to elucidate the physical characters 

 of the Ugrian or Ugorian races, under which term late writers have 

 coraj)rised the Finns and Lappes, the Magyars or Hungarians, and 

 several nations of Siberia*. 



" This is owing to the fact that but few specimens of the skulls of 

 these nations exist in any of the collections in Europe, and few and 

 by no means perfect descriptions of them have been published. 

 Blumenbach has given in his ' Decades Craniorum' a representation 

 of the skull of a Lai)pe, and he describes it as approaching altogether 

 to the Mongolian variety. Dr. Hueck gives an account of the ap- 

 pearance and general j)hysical characters of the Esthonian Finns, 

 and sums up his observatiuii< l)y ].' inting mit some very considerable 

 diflferences which he finds between them and the Mongolian form ; 

 in fact he says that he can discover nothing common to the Mongo- 

 lian and Esthonian skulls, except a certain squareness of figure, which 

 is not constant. 



" From these statements we should be led to suppose that there is 

 a great difference between the skulls of the Finns and Lappes, and we 

 should be inclined to adopt the opinion maintained by Lehrberg, 

 that they are two separate and distinct races, his argument being 



* Dcr L'Tisclie Volkstamm von F. II. Miillcr. 



