214 



EXPERBIENT STATION. 



[Jan. 



was observed. The berries from Plots A and C were somewhat 

 larger than those from their checks, as shown by the following 

 averages of connts of berries of 6 cnpfiil samples (Xew Eng- 

 land Cranberry Sales Company's inspector's cnp) from each 

 plot and its check, the samples being in each case taken as 

 evenly as possible from the various boxes : — 



f Average of first 6 samples, 

 [ Average of second 6 samples, 

 n V A I Average of first 6 samples, 



I Average of second 6 samples, 

 f Average of first 6 samples, 

 I Average of second 6 samples, 

 r Average of first 6 samples, 

 [ Average of second 6 samples, 



Plot A. 



Plot C. 



Check C. 



The berries from the IMcFarlin plot showed pi 

 difference in size from those of the check, as is cvid 

 following averages of 6 samples taken in the same way: — 



Number of 

 Berries. 



100 



105 



110 



104 



104 



108i 



112 



111 



actically no 

 nt from the 



p, , -n f Average of first 6 samples, 



\ Average of second 6 samples, . 



p, 1. Tj I Average of first 6 samples, 



\ Average of second 6 samples, . 



Number of 

 Berries. 



. 67 



. 72 



. 68 



71 



Of the Early Black plots, Plot D and its check showed prac- 

 tically no difference in the sizes of their berries, as is shown by 

 the following averages of counts of 6 samples : — 



Plot 



-p. f Average of first 6 samples, 

 [ Average of second 6 samples. 



Check D. 



Average of first 6 samples, 

 Average of second 6 samples. 



Number of 

 Berries. 



. 110 



. 109 



. Ill 



. 109 



The berries from Plot E were distinctly smaller than those 

 from its checks, as is shown by the following average;? : — 



Plot 



-p f Average of first 6 samples, 

 \ Average of second 6 samples, 



Chpck F i ^"^'crage of first 6 samples, 



* \ Average of second 6 samples. 



Number of 

 Berries. 



. 120 



. 123 



. 113 



. 109 



