Supplement, <J-e.] CXLVIII. ORCHIDE.E. (J. D. Hooker.) 197 



P. 55. For 1. S. GEMINATUM read GEMMATUM. 



P. 60. Under the citations for 20, S. CALCEOLABE j in line 2, for Bot. Reg. 1883, 

 Misc. 130, read 1838, Misc. 75. 



P. 62. To syns. of 29. S. LONGIFOLIUM add brides rigidum, Smith in Rees. 

 Cyclop. 



30. S. WIGHTIANUM, under the syns. place Thwaites Enum. 303. after Lindl. 

 Fol. Orchid. 2. 



P. 88. 3. G. JAVANICA, add to habitats, CEYLON, on roots of coffee trees in the 

 Central Province, Thwaites. 



P. 107. 1. Z. SULCATA, add to syns. Orchis strateumatica, Linn. Sp. PI. 903. 



P. 116. 5. H. ELONGATA, add to syns. Rhamphidia elongata, Thwaites Enum. 

 313 ; and to habitats, CEYLON, alt. 4000 ft., Thwaites. 



P. 141. 30. Habenaria longecalcarata. Two species are confounded here, having 

 been mixed up in Wight's descriptions, Icones and Herbarium ; they are 



30. H. LONGECALCARATA, A. Rich. (Wight Ic. t. 925, Dalz. fy Gibs. I.e.) with 

 few (2-3) very large flowers, large cucullate sheathing bracts much shorter than the 

 long-pedicelled ovary, lip twice as long as the sepals. 



30/1. H. DECIPIENS, Wight Ic. vol. v. pt. i. p. 14, with several (4-8) smaller flowers, 

 very short pedicels, lanceolate bracts nearly as long as the ovary, lip rather longer than 

 the" sepals. H. montana, Wight (not of A. Rich.) Ic. t. 827, and 1714 the upper 

 right and the left hand figures only. This much resembles H. longicornu Lindl. 

 (montana, A. Rich.) but has a longer lip and much longer spur. Wight has given it 

 both names in his Herbarium, and says there that it is intermediate between 

 longicornu and longecalcarata. 



P. 147. 48. H. CHLOEINA, insert Par. fy before Eeichb.f. 



P. 151. 63. H. CBASSIFOLIA, add to syns. P. canarensis, Lindl. Plant. HohenacTc* 

 Exsicc. n. 142. 



P. 165. 106. H. DECIPIENS. This name being confirmed for Wight's plant (see 

 above) must be replaced by H. GBIFFITHII. 



INDIAN ORCHIDEJE OF UNDETERMINED AFFINITY. 



In the above revision of the Indian Orchids 1 have doubtless overlooked some 

 species that have been published in one or other of the multitude of works I have 

 had to ransack, and in others that have escaped my notice ; and for which I must 

 beg indulgence. There are further some published ones, of which from the incomplete- 

 ness of the descriptions in respect especially of the pollinia, I have been unable to 

 determine the genera. The chief of these are Koeuig's Indian species, referred to 

 Epidendrum (a genus now known to be peculiar to the New World,) and published 

 in the 6th Part (p. 43 et seq.) of Retz's Observationes (in 1791). Of these few have 

 been taken up bv subsequent authors. They are for the most part Peninsular and 

 probably all communicated by Heyne, who included a few Malaccan species from 

 his correspondents. The descriptions are so full aud good in all but the pollinia, &c., 

 that local botanists may in time recognize many of them. It is unfortunate that 

 Koeuig should not have identified any of tueua with Rheede's plates. 



Epidendrum bidentatum, Keen, in Retz. Obs. Pt. vi. 54 = Limodorum bidentatum, 



Willd. Sp. PL iv. 124. 



calceolaria 45 



Calceolaria terrestre 63 Malacca. 



clavatum 50 = ? Saccolabitini clavatmn, 



Lindl. Gen. & Sp. 223. 



complanatum 50 = Sarcochilus complana- 



tus, Hook. f. ante p. 41. 

 Flabellura Veneris 57 



Flor aeris v. Saaronicum 58 = Renanthera Arachnites, 



ex. Lindl. Gen. $ Sp. 217. 

 Flos seris ? 64 



