COLLECTION OF SECTIONS. 33 
and all doubt seemed to be overcome. Nevertheless, judging by past 
experience, unchecked counting leaves a doubt wherever the rings are 
reduced to 0.1 to 0.2 mm. in thickness. 
Another disadvantage of this group is that the trees came from 
very diverse localities, and hence do not represent homogeneous con- 
ditions. Therefore, each section in the group will have special men- 
tion. The first number in the group, B11, was cut from a log of 
Pinus silvestris lying on the woodpile in the yard of the forest school 
at Sopteland. The tree had been brought in for firewood late in 1912, 
but was undoubtedly dead at that time, for the outermost ring checked 
with the Os group unmistakably as 1911. This view was supported 
by the decayed bark and moldy trunk. This section was 9 by 14 
inches in size and had the center (date 1734) some 3 inches from one 
end, producing one of the most uniform cases of eccentric growth which 
I have seen. 
Nos. B 12, 13, and 14 cross-identify most satisfactorily with the Os 
group. From one to six individual characters or a most convincing 
sequence of characters were obvious in every decade. Section 12, a 
foot across, was cut in 1909, and the last complete ring was unmis- 
takably of 1908 by comparison with the previous group. A section 
was cut for me at the school in Sopteland. The original was marked 
“No. 1, 1909, Knagenkjelm, Kaupanger,” a location on Sogne Fjord, 
some 80 miles northeast of Bergen. My section shows the bark and 
very dense, handsome wood with strongly marked rings. Its center is 
at 1682. No. B 13, center at 1807, is of about the same size and from 
the same place, and was marked ‘‘No. III, 1909.”’ Its outer ring also 
identified as 1908. A portion of this section also was cut for me. 
No. B14, center 1779, was marked “No. 1, 1909, Lyster Sana- 
torium,” on Sogne Fjord. As in the other two cases, its outer ring was 
plainly 1908. A thin section was cut for me. Its size was 12 by 14 
inches. B 16 was marked “No. 3, 1909,” from the same place. This 
huge section was 28 inches in diameter and 7 inches thick, and its 
center was about 1724. There was a series of very small rings from 
1787 to 1794 and another from 1806 to 1813. I have no section of it 
and so no cross-identification could be attempted, but the measures of 
the recent years agree with No. 14 from the same place. © 
No. B 15, center at 1633, was also measured at the school and no 
section retained for comparison with the others. It is the only one from 
its locality. It was marked ‘No. 1, 1909, Nestaas, Granvin,”’ on 
Hardanger Fjord. It was cut in October and the first ring was con- 
sidered to be of that same year. The rings were very clear back to 
1680 and in fact to the center, but between the center and 1680 they 
were very small. ° 
