COLLECTION OF SECTIONS. 39 
Geological Museum at Berlin, in which the same cycle was prominent. 
It was not measured, as the date of cutting was not known. 
PILSEN (AUSTRIA) GROUP. 
This group of 7 Pinus silvestris sections was measured in the office 
of Dr. A. Cieslar, in the Hochschule der Bodenkultur at Vienna. I 
have no samples of them in my collection, but they were carefully 
cross-identified before measuring. Two sections had the ring for 1849 
very doubtful, but its identity was verified by comparison with the 
others. The average date of the center was 1821 and the average size 
11 inches in diameter. They all came from a forest station near Pilsen, 
in northwestern Austria. I have not seen the locality, but judging by 
the appearance of the country a little farther south the mountains are 
not rugged. 
The mean measures upon this group from 1830 to 1912 are given 
on page 114; their plot is in figure 8. The curve is very peculiar, 
and it is hard to say how it should be corrected for age. It descends 
sharply from 3.62 mm. in 1830 to 1.25 mm. in 1851, and from that 
point on it remains 1.25. This bent line has been applied, and the 
resulting percentages have been smoothed and plotted in figure 24. 
SOUTHERN BAVARIA GROUP. 
This group of 7 Pinus silvestris and 1 Picea excelsa sections was cut 
for me by the kindness of Messrs. Klépfer and Konigen in Munich 
from logs in their yards. The trees had been cut in the winter of 
1911-12 at Altotlinz, Ober Bayern, some 50 miles south, at a con- 
siderable altitude, in the northern valleys of the Alps. The ringsin 
all these were clear and distinct and no doubtful cases were found 
except a very few near the center of two sections, which were omitted 
in the means; yet the cross-identification was not fully satisfactory. 
Sections numbered M 2, M 6, and M8 in this group showed 1 to 2 
entire discordances out of about 10 features in the last 60 years. The 
others agree fairly well. Possibly this condition results from the rugged 
and non-homogeneous region where they grew. 
On page 116 will be found the means from 1848 to 1911. In these, 
M 6 and M 7 are extrapolated for about 12 years, and M 8 for 2. 
These means will be found plotted in figure 8. The curve shows 
apparently a very rapid decrease of growth with age. The correction 
line assumed is a line reading about 3.15 mm. in 1850, 2.10 mm. in 
1860, then with decreasing slope reaching a nearly level line at 0.90 
mm. between 1895 and 1911. The means have been reduced to per- 
centages of this line and smoothed by Hann’s formula and plotted in 
figure 24. 
