Lepidoptera. 7 



orange apical patch of the fore wing and in the fifth this patch 

 is entirely fuscous with a transverse row of 4 — 5 obsolete grev- 



ish spots. 



28. Teracolus ephyia Klug. 2 dV. — Khartum. 



29. Teracolus evarne Klug. var. hib. citreus Butl. 2 <?<?, 

 6 99. — Eenk, Grebel Ahmed Agha, Kaka; February and March. 



Four of the females agree tolerably well with the dry season 

 form figured (PI. 29, f. 1*, l l ) by Miss Sharpe, but are much 

 yellower on the upper side. The other two are very different, 

 reminding one of the female figured by Geyer (Hubner, Zutr. 

 figg. 993, 994 *). They are, however, much smaller (26 — 27 mm.) 

 and of a paler, nearly whitish ground-colour on the upper sid<\ 



30. Eronia cleodora Hubn. var erxia Hew. Id". — Gebelein; 

 March. 



A small specimen (51 mm.), but agreeing with erxia in the 

 width of the marginal black band of the hind wings. 



31. Catopsilia florella Fabr. 1 a*. — To the South of Kaka; 

 February. 



Fam. Papilionidae. 



32. Papilio demodocus Esper. 1 d 1 , 1 ?. — Khartum, Fe- 

 bruary 2. 



Fam. Hesperidae. 



33. Sarangesa eliminata Holl. Proc. Zool. Soc. 1896, p. 9, 

 t, 5, f. 9 (1896). — Butler Proc. Zool. Soc. 1898, p. 414 (1898). 

 2 dV. — The White Nile (without locality). 



The Cyclopides phiclyle Walk. Ent. 5, p. 56 (1870) may 

 perhaps be this species. The dark brown colour of the fore 

 wing is more distinct before the discal hyaline spots than in 

 Hollands figure, forming a distinct transverse band and also a 

 large subquadrate costal patch before the three small subapical 

 hyaline dots. 



Fam. Sphingidae. 



34. Protoparce convolvuli L. 3 ex. — The White Nile; Febr. 

 1 This form of the female is not mentioned or figuted l»v Mi- Sharpk. 



Jagerskiold: Expedition. 8. (') * 



