Questions raised,- 



1. If we adopted this method without check, would 

 wo get as accurate results? 



2* Purchasers would surely grumble if estimates 

 were too high. 



3, In small sales scaling can often "be cone with 

 supervision and means but little real loss of . 

 time. 



4, Such sales should bo optional. 



Sierra. Bst imat e Scale Loss or Gain 



71. 7C 90.15 - 18.45 



69.12 77.64 8.52 



Cost 3,05 each. If scaling had been done, would 

 have cost 4,52 each. Loss due to inaccuracy of volume 

 tablos. Supervisor does not consider this method feasible. 

 Tahoe . Est imat e Scale Loss or Gain 



lo.l $85.00 $79.58 / 5.42 



If scaling had been done , administration would 

 have cost 4,59 moro as determined by a checlr scalo in 

 which scaling was done* 



Uo.2 $49.55 $49.34 ~ $ S 21 



Scaling cost 5.35. Supervisor recomnonds against 

 sales by estimate since the saving, if any, is immaterial, 

 practice is subject to criticism from purchasers and ho 

 loses the feeling that sales are "being handled in a business- 

 like way. 



2, Cooperative deposits for brushpiling. Zfeperimont 

 (bhaeta, and 3r lamas) 



3 More clo-ar-cut marking -policy* ^ Sample marking on 



Sierra and Slaioath. 



9 y 



