ohargo for such use can now be made. 



There is one point I would lil:o to "bring out: 

 Naturally, there are a great many uses on unperfectod min- 

 ing claims not under permit - uses not necessary for the 

 development of the claim. In view of the sentiment ex- 

 pressed "by this Mining Congress ~ I thinlr wo would "bettor 

 go very oasy on changing over to the pay proposition. '7e 

 want the true prospector with us. IJso your imagination on 

 what is the purpose of the land classification aside from 

 tho main purpose for which it was designed, and Ireep that 

 in mind. 



Discus sion. 



Barrott said that ths matter of demand- 

 ing an initial payment from a prospect- 

 ive permittee to cover examination costs 

 so that if the applicant's ardor cooled 

 the Service v;ould not have to bear the 

 orpense, had boon taSren up v/ith the For- 

 ester, and an amendment suggested which 

 will authorize tlie Supervisor to u e his 

 judgment in the natter of calling for 

 payment "before or after issuance of per- 

 mit. 



Hatton said lie didn't thinlr we could do 

 that, being servants oi the public we 

 should render that service even if we 

 bore the cost in somo casss. 



2:30 - TThy tfses Cost $35.83 per Permit on the Sequoia - 

 TThat it Should Cost - How tho Soruoia will Beach 

 That figure in Puturo. 



WYSB03: Apparent cost - 036.83. 



Causes: (l) Circulars cautioning against Miscel- 

 laneous Executive Charge. Catch-all or graveyard of costs. 

 Specific lines. (2). Over-zeal in charging to specific 

 lines too much to uses. Time of Supervisor in District 



