pure stands of lodgepolo pine, which probably compose 75/ 

 of the lodgopole wo have; and the third class woulc be com- 

 posed o:L lodgopole and yellow pine. In that sito the yel- 

 low pina is rcall^r at hone, and oho lodgepole just drifts 

 in. Glass 1 about 75 1 to IOC 1 or 110 T ; class 2 about 50 T 

 to 75 T and class 5- 50 ! or undor. 



Margolin: Hef erring bac:: to the origin- 

 al question - Tho statomont I/CD made 

 that V7G e.ro interested in laio\7in.^ \7liat 

 \7Q v/ill have there for o"bjectc of man- 

 agement , and that wo can got "jhat from 

 the O3tiuato sheets, 3up~oce that 7011 

 have temporary t^os - cup; ose you'liava 

 a Iniob oono area, a lodgepole area, a 

 "brush area. r '. r e :3io\7 thcc e aro temporary 

 typos, and the par*-;ioular site occupied 

 and the surrounding timbor are mec-gor 

 indications of what the potential value 

 of those temporary typos is. "7o !moT7 

 that iHiob cone aroa surrounded lay yel- 

 low pine can sustain yellow pine. 

 Mitchell: 1 moager indication is all 

 we have - 7o have got to have something 

 "better. 



Du3 o i s : It s e G LQ to no t hat Hit c he 1 1 

 has co mo nearest to it so far - That the 

 discussion is really "ba.se cl on a confu- 

 sion of torxas, ^ -o thin*;s aro T ./anted. 

 One is a stand map in silvi cultural 

 form for ens clasc of forest to which a 

 certain sot of principles of narking 

 would a; ply - tho type classification is 

 the true silviciiltural idea. 7e are ap- 

 pl3/ing the torn "t^Tpo" to two things - 

 to a "bunch of forests with similar char- 

 acteristics or e. bunch of physical fac- 

 tors that will produce certain charac- 

 teristics. Isn T t it possible to get 

 another term that will fit the set of 

 physical factors that we need to get in 

 order to determine the future management 

 of the .7orest - Gould you sugroct a term 

 that would indicate what wo want? 

 Mitchell: I think that the District 

 Poroster of District 6 suggested a good 

 E9S 



