109 Domesday and Feudal Statistics 



Duke before which he had feft to the extent of 1 1 5 fees 

 military 3 [wV* his son's charter 1 1 66] likewise before the 

 seivice. death of said Roger, his son in law (the said Wm.), 

 had of the gift of Hen. I., 15 and 10 fees already 

 subinfeuded [vide his son's charter 1166]; in 

 addition Florence, of Worcester (1086) uses the 

 expression, q not feudatos milites, referring to Z). 5., 

 and tho' that valuable record is no Feodary, it 

 gives the information the chronicler records, tho' 

 not in so ample a manner, as would occur in a 

 specific return of Knight Service. 



The Exon. D. B. ; the /. C. C., and /. E. (ed. 



Hamilton), in conjunction with D. B. set early 



feudal tenure in a clearer aspect : in the latter 



Subin- [/. E., presumably /. Wm. I., and almost certainly 



? u wS/: I][ th cent.], amongst the list of ploughs (p. 168, 



ed. Hamilton, and in all 2 of his originals), occurs 



the following [hitherto unnoticed, ut credo'}, with 



reference to the vill of Teusham,* Hoc tenet 



iohannes in feudo de abbate pro duobus militibus. 



Another reference to military service occurs in 



Duke Will. Gemet., of the early nth century [accipiens 



Mnltary s muncre comitatum ut inde exhiberet ei militice statuta, 



Service. compare, in statute servitio Milicie in the Charter 



of Hen. I., Lib. El. ///.], which (former) is cited 



more fully in The Scutage and Knight Service of 



England.^ 



* Vide D. B., i. 191/2 and 201^, where the lordship of the 

 vill is divided between the Abbot of Ely and John/^Waleran, 

 perhaps the same tenant as in I. E., ut sup. 



t The reference to Wm. de Jumieges was made known to- 

 writer by this work (J. F. Baldwin, Univ. Chicago Press, iSyf), 

 which is well deserving the attention of all interested in the 



