16 FISH AND GAME COMMISSION 



People vs. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District is another case of 

 general interest and was pending at the close of the biennium. This 

 important fish screen case has already been commented upon under 

 the heading just preceding. 



Numerous other cases have been handled and a great variety of 

 work has included giving legal advice and opinions to the Commis- 

 sioners and their representatives, the preparation of leases and agree- 

 ments and the preparation and study of proposed new legislation. 



ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 



This report M^ould be incomplete if it failed to acknowledge the 

 assistance which has been given by Federal, State, County and Munici- 

 pal agencies, by sportsmen's associations and service clubs, and by 

 numerous commercial organizations. The Southern Pacific, Western 

 Pacific, Santa Fe, Northw^estern Pacific, Sacramento Northern, and 

 several other transportation companies have generously transported 

 fish cars, fish cans, eggs and hatchery personnel without cost to the 

 Commission. This very material assistance, together with help from 

 the other agencies noted, has made it possible for the Fish and Game 

 Commission to make the sportsman's dollar go much further than 

 would otherwise be possible. In addition, it has joined all conservation 

 agencies in a common task with a resulting increase in efficiency and 

 interest. 



Respectfully submitted. 



John L. Farley, 

 Executive Officer. 



