﻿COPEPODA 



57 



Pacific between 6i^ N. and 52° N., between 10° S. and 55' S. west of vSonth-Anierica, and ioS° I.. W. 

 Equator (Giesbrecht 1892) and off California (Esterly 1905). In the North Atlantic it has been 

 recorded on the west side off Woods Hole (Wheeler 1900) and on the east from the Faeroes to Gibraltar. 

 According to Scott (1894) it is fairly common in the Oulf of Guinea as far south as the Congo; 

 Wolfenden shares, probably rightly, the opinion that the species which the mentioned author 

 describes as P. parvus really is Paracalainis aculcatns Giesbr., which represents this species in the 

 South Atlantic (191 1, p. 203;. In addition to all these localities this species is found in the southern 

 part of the Baltic, the Kattegat and the North Sea. 



Pseudocalanidae. 



10. Pseudocalanus niinutus Kroyer. 

 (Plate I fig. 8; text-figs. 13 a — f and 14 a — c). 



1903. Pseudocalanus elon.t^atus Boeck. Jensen, Johansen, Le- 



viusen, p. 304, tahel II. 



1845 — 47. Calanus minutus n. sp. Kroyer, T. 41 fig. 4. 



1849. Calanus minutus Kr. KrG3'er, pp. 543—44, 552. 



1S64. Clausia elongata n. sp. Boeck, p. 234. 



1872. Pseudocalanus elongatus Boeck. Boeck, p, 37. 



1S92. — — Boeck.Giesbrecht, pp. 197 — 200, 



taf. 10. 

 1892. Clausia elongata Boeck. Canu, pp.170 — 171; pi. II, figs. 



I — 13- 



1597. Pseudocalanus elongatus Boeck. Vanhoffen, p. 27S, pi. I, 



fig. 6. 

 1S9S. — ^ — Giesbrecht & ,Sclimeil, 



p. 2S. 



1598. — — — Aurivillius, pp. 69 — 70. 

 1900. — — — G. O. Sars, p. 69. 



1900. — major n. sp. G. O. Sars, pp. 69—72, pi. XX. 



1901. — elongatus Boeck. Th. \- A. Scott, p. 339. 



1902. — — — Mrazek, pp. 507—508, 



figs. 5-6. 

 1902. — — — Th. Scott, p. 450. 



1902. — — — Wolfenden, p. 361. 



1903. — — — Norman, p. 135. 

 1903. — — — I. C. Thompson, p. 16. 

 1903. — — — G. O. Sars, pp. 20—21, 



pis X-XI. 

 1903. — gracilis n. sp. G. O. Sars, pp. 154 — 155. 



pi. I (.SnppL). 



Synonymy. As Kroyer has described and figured a young male of his species, it is perhaps 

 not so curious that the different authors have not realized that it is identical with Psnidocalanus rloii- 

 gatus Boeck. Kroyer's description and figure are however so good, that scarcely any other species from 

 the Arctic Sea has a pernultimate stage to be confounded with it. As I have had the opportunit\- of 

 examining Kroyer's original specimens, it is quite evident to me, tliat the two species are identical; 

 the three examined specimens belonged all to the penultimate stage (ic? -{- 2$); they were in the shape 

 of the head most alike Ps. oracilis. and were of middle size. According to the general rules of nomen- 

 clature the name Ps. rlongafiis ought to be changed to Ps. viiiuitus Kr., if the three forms are referred 

 to a single species. 



Tlic In^olf-Espeditioii. III. }. 



1903. 



1904. 



1905- 

 1905. 

 1906. 

 1906. 

 1907. 

 1907. 

 1 90S. 

 1908. 



I9IO. 



I9IO. 

 I9II. 

 1913- 



1913- 



— — J C.Thompson &.\ Scott, 



p. 244. 



— — Wolfenden, p.m. 



— — G. O. Sars, p. 3. 



— — Farran, p. 30. 



— — Pearson, p. to. 



— — Williams, p. 640. 

 major G. G. Sars. Koefoed & Danias, p. 407. 

 gracilis G. O. Sars. Koefoed&Damas, p. 406. 

 major G. O. Sars. v. Bremen, p. 25, fig. 22. 

 elongatus Boeck. v. Bremen, p. 25, fig. 23. 



— — Farran, p. 28. 



— — Oberg, pp. 48-49, 56-57 



taf. I and VI fig. 3. 



— — Kraeeft, pp. 67, 77. 79, 



taf. I figs. 13 21. 



— — Steuer, p. 22. 



— — Farran pp. 63— 65. 



— — .Stephensen, pp.71 72, 



pis 4-5- 



— — Stephensen pp. 31; — 13. 



