SEED INSPECTION 



27 



Table 5. Summary, by Wholesalers, of the Perfarraauce 

 of Flower Seeds in the Field 



Total No Samples *No. Samples **>I'J- Samples 



Seeds Packeted by Tested Satisfactory Unsat.slactory 



Ball, George J. Co 10 "^ " 



W. Chicago, 111. 



Breck, Joseph & Sons, Inc 13 13 



Boston, Mass. 



Burpee, \V. Atlee Co 22 21 1 



Philadelphia. Pa. 



Comstock, P'erre & Co 1 1 1^ ' 



Wethersfield, Conn. 



Crosman Seed Corp 22 



Rochester, N. V. 



De Jager & Sons 6 6 



So. Hamilton, 111 



Ferry-Morse Seed Co 27 



Wethersfield, Conn. 



Fredonia Seed Co 20 20 



Fredonia, N. V. 



1 3 



Germain's, Inc •' 



Los .\ngeles, Cal. 



Harris, Joseph Co H " ° 



Rochester, N. Y. 



Hart, Chas. C. Seed Co 14 ^ ^ 



Wethersfield, Conn. 



Hawkins, Budd D 6 6 (^ 



Wethersfield, Conn. 



Mandeville & King Co 26 26 



Rochester, N. Y. 



Mitchell, Henrv Co 2 2 



Philadelphia, Pa. 



Northrup. King & Co 28 28 



Minneapolis, Minn. 



The Page Seed Co 8 ^ ^ 



Greene, N. Y. 



Pelletized Seed Co 4*0 



New York, N. Y. 



Rice. J. B. Jr., Co 18 16 2 



Shushan, N. Y. 



Rice, Jerome B. Co 5 ^ 



Cambridge, N. Y. 



Sears, Roebuck & Co 8 8 



Chicago, 111. 



Skidelsky, Henry Co 2 2 



New York, N. Y. 



Vaughan's Seed Store 26 26 



New York, N. Y. 



Woodruff's Triple "T" Seed Co 12 12 



Wethersfield. Conn. 



304 300 4 



♦Samples that are found to agree with the label and whose germination is above the "worthlse.s 

 for sale" point. 

 •♦Samples found that do not agree with the label, or samples whose germination is considered 

 "worthless for sale", or samples labeled mixtures that do not contain an adequate proportion 

 of different types to be considered good mbctures. 



