198 Bibliografia Ι. - App. IV. 



RuD. Seydel : Der Fortschritt der Metaphysik innerhalb der 



Schule des ionischen Hylozoismus )\ Leipzig, 1860. 

 G. Spicker : De dicto quodam Anaximandri philosophi. « Ind. 



lect. », Munster, 1883. 

 H. Spitzer : Ueber Ursprung und Bedeutung des Hylozoismus. 



Graz, 1881. 

 K. Steinhart : lonische Schule in « Allg. Enzyklop. der Kiinste 



u. Wissensch. Sekt. », II, V. 22, p. 457. (non visto). 

 — Diogenes v. Ap. id. I, V. 25, p. 296. (id.). 

 WiLH. Uhrig : De Hippone atheo, Giessae, 1848. 

 J. Wells : The genuiness of the γης περίοδος of Hecateus. 



« J. Hell. Stud. », 29 (1903) p. 41. 



L'A. così riassume le sue conclusioni : « To sum up the whole question. 

 For the genuinemes of the f.-agments we bave the evidence of Eratosthenes, a 

 really great name. Against it we bave the fact that no one refers to Hecateus 

 as a geograpber till the third century, we bave the contempi of Heraclitus, 

 the sUence of Aristotle, and the decisive verdict of Callimachus [Athenaios 

 II 70 ; Εκαταίος ó Μίλήσιος έκ Α^ίας πΐ|5«»ι^ν5ϊΐΐ, ύ y^riiioi τοΰ συ•/•/ρα^έΜς 

 τό j3iS)iov. Καλλί/Λκχος yàjS Ν/υιώτου άνα'/ρά^'ϊΐ] ; we must consider too 

 that tbeir genuineness seems to many to involve a serious condemnation of 

 Herodotus ; and we bave to explain the est raordinary unimportance of the 

 iragments, if they really represent a sixth-century work of epocb-making im- 

 portance. Surely the comulative weigbt of these arguments is convincing ; 

 singly they migbt we)l he said to leave the case an open one, but 

 coUectively they go far to prove the theory of forgery. » 



Weygoldt Diog. V. Αρ., «Arch. Gesch. Philos, », I (1888) 

 p. 161. 



E, WiNDiscH : Ueber den Sitz der denkenden Seele, besonders 

 bei den Indern und Griechen. « Verh. sàchs. Gesellsch. d. 

 Wissensch. Philol.-hist. CI.», 43 (1891) p. 155. 



Th. Ziegler : Ein Wort von Anaximander. « Arch. Gesch. Phi- 

 los. », I (1888) p. 16. 



