Tudor Wharf Draft Environmental Impact Report EOEA # 67 4' 



the reasons a small boat rental operation 

 was felt to be hazardous. In addition, 

 there is heavy large and small boat 

 traffic through the Charles River Locks, 

 and additional small boat traffic would 

 increase the likelihood of accidents. 



The use of the bridge vaults for parking 

 was ruled out in response to concerns 

 excpressed by several reviewing agencies. 

 The proponents have enlarged the proposed 

 underground parking structure to 

 accommodate up to 303 automobiles. 

 However, the proponent does remain 

 concerned that the bridge vaults be used 

 for uses consistent with the proposed 

 project. Water dependent uses are seen as 

 consistent with the project. 



1.6.2 No Build 



The No-Build alternative would leave a 

 deteriorating site without any of the 

 many benefits outlined in this report. 

 The site currently is not conducive to 

 public activities and is essentially off 

 limits. 



The No-build option means reduced taxes 

 for the City and Commonwealth. The No- 

 build option also reduces the impacts 

 this project will have on the 

 infrastructure. There would be 20,125 

 gallons per day less water consumed and 



-26- 



